Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 85    Average: 3/5]
54 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 60321
Rating: 3
Date: 11/24/07 02:01 AM

54 Responses to Top 10 Errors in Science Fiction Movies

  1. Profile photo of fancylad
    fancylad Male 30-39
    18411 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 1:35 am
    Link: Top 10 Errors in Science Fiction Movies - The biggest, most common mistakes Hollywood makes (or ignores) when a sci-fi flick is involved.
  2. Profile photo of jacobubub
    jacobubub Male 13-17
    136 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:07 am
    I suppose my dreams were just crushed in an instant
  3. Profile photo of Isobar
    Isobar Male 18-29
    293 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:10 am
    hah I knew 3 of these, not bad I guess.
  4. Profile photo of lockedup
    lockedup Female 18-29
    299 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:10 am
    Some people just can`t have fun... Who cares that flames can`t exist in the vacuum of space? It makes for good entertainment.
  5. Profile photo of Tymberwulf
    Tymberwulf Male 30-39
    99 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:10 am
    I got to love the whole you can`t have explosions in space since there is no oxygen. Hmmm, seems when we go into space we breath vacuum eh? Sure it won`t have the effects as an explosion in an atmosphere, but there is oxygen in the ships/space stations/death stars/etc., and that would burn really well. :)
  6. Profile photo of -NeonCarrot-
    -NeonCarrot- Male 13-17
    1499 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:13 am
    Maybe in the future there`s an advanced type of fire?
    Ever think about that one? :O
  7. Profile photo of nerb
    nerb Female 18-29
    296 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:48 am
    I thought that was entirely part of sci fi films? To be utterly outrageous and have so many holes you could use it as a sieve? ^_^

    I love my sci fi. It is corn of the best kind.

  8. Profile photo of Jay2645
    Jay2645 Male 13-17
    140 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:54 am
    I always thought the flames were running on the oxygen let out by the roosterpit being breached.
  9. Profile photo of Jay2645
    Jay2645 Male 13-17
    140 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:55 am
    Lol, I mean "Crew Areas".
  10. Profile photo of smileyearth
    smileyearth Female 13-17
    26 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 3:05 am
    This article is so true.
  11. Profile photo of xViTAMiN22
    xViTAMiN22 Male 18-29
    991 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 3:15 am
    Oh. Cool..
    Not really into sci-fi though.
  12. Profile photo of kokobeanie
    kokobeanie Female 30-39
    18 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 3:20 am
    I think the biggest error that someone overlooked is that it`s Science Fiction. Or... Scientific Fantasy for purely entertainment purposes only. Unless you are someone inventing the cellphone from Star Trek.
  13. Profile photo of Shanir
    Shanir Male 30-39
    1074 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 6:13 am
    some of them are stupid like the bugged eyed alien how can you even say that they look like us and that we are the only humans in the universe get real
  14. Profile photo of brutalnz
    brutalnz Male 30-39
    1386 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 6:53 am
    It`s called science FICTION for a good reason, morons
  15. Profile photo of Trizz
    Trizz Male 18-29
    1383 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 7:17 am
    What are they on about? I was about to write that same thing brutalnz!
  16. Profile photo of ninjacache
    ninjacache Male 18-29
    221 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 8:22 am
    It is called science fiction if I wanted accuracy, I would watch science non-fiction......Dumb
  17. Profile photo of Itsdude56
    Itsdude56 Male 13-17
    889 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 9:17 am
    Armageddon -that movie had lots of flaws >_>
  18. Profile photo of radar2434
    radar2434 Male 13-17
    230 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 9:32 am
    Yeah because Alien/Human breeding is what`s un-realistic about star trek
  19. Profile photo of StapleMeElmo
    StapleMeElmo Male 18-29
    1029 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 9:56 am
    This is so f*cking dumb they don`t know anything. I bet they`ve never even SEEN Star Trek. Inertia dampeners anyone? God the worst post due to it`s know-nothingness.
  20. Profile photo of LadyAlathia
    LadyAlathia Female 18-29
    151 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 9:59 am
    Oh good Lord...

    Why in the world would anyone spend the time to try to shoot down the Sci-fi geeks.

    Guess what? We know.

    The thing is... we don`t CARE.

    Our fantasy is superior to your reality.

  21. Profile photo of DBtG
    DBtG Male 18-29
    330 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 10:32 am
    2001 trumps it all. Kubrick was the f*cking man.
  22. Profile photo of LazyMe484
    LazyMe484 Male 18-29
    10445 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 11:40 am
    Lady > agreed, more or less...

    most of these reasons were based in physics, wich would not be a genuine reason for this sort of thing, the other non-physics ones were good points though, like the one with the plain planets.

  23. Profile photo of Ludicrous001
    Ludicrous001 Male 18-29
    7 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 11:58 am
    Whoever wrote that article has no idea what they`re saying
  24. Profile photo of DeeCache
    DeeCache Male 18-29
    789 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 11:59 am
    That was dumb, Without sound, who would watch a movie? Like come on. These people are just whiney cuz the cant make movies like that >=D
  25. Profile photo of CmdrBittles
    CmdrBittles Female 18-29
    1173 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 12:09 pm
    I was expecting specific mistakes in specific movies (Sasquatch with a watch on type of thing). I was dissapointed.
  26. Profile photo of CheesyQueso
    CheesyQueso Female 18-29
    2197 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 12:10 pm
    this is made by the same guy who made the video game list and he admitted that he knew nothing about video games i doubt he knows much bout sci fi so calm down
  27. Profile photo of Yaos
    Yaos Male 18-29
    78 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 12:11 pm
    All that complaining and they forgot to complain that none of this sci-fi stuff is real!
  28. Profile photo of B3nt
    B3nt Male 18-29
    96 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 12:17 pm
    Whatever, geeks. I am a huge sci-fi fan, but I prefer it to be as realistic as possible following all known laws of physics if at all possible. None of that fantasy crap. If you still want to believe in fairies, go tell your mommy to read you a story.
  29. Profile photo of TomSFox
    TomSFox Male 18-29
    732 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 12:53 pm
    " would be impossible for us to communicate at all with a race that has no concept of sight and sound."

    Uh... what about Hellen Keller?

  30. Profile photo of Wey_Pooh
    Wey_Pooh Male 18-29
    1004 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 1:02 pm
    hah. stupid movie producers need to go back to school. they`re teaching kids all the wrong stuff. hairy aliens in space. lmao.
  31. Profile photo of BigWaFuu
    BigWaFuu Male 18-29
    1163 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:12 pm
    website isnt loading for me. Shame
  32. Profile photo of jkahoon
    jkahoon Female 18-29
    178 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 2:31 pm
    Website isn`t working for me either..
  33. Profile photo of Vanwa
    Vanwa Female 13-17
    357 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 3:50 pm
    I think iab took it down. Shame on us
  34. Profile photo of MarvinTheDog
    MarvinTheDog Male 18-29
    11 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 4:29 pm
    I think that the point of merging science with fiction is to make the fiction seem more real. That is why I like science-fiction, because it makes the story so believable. So I can totally understand why one would want to get rid of all the explosions and sound effects in space-movies. On the other hand I dont think 100% realism dont suit all sci fi-movies.
  35. Profile photo of ilikeggs485
    ilikeggs485 Male 13-17
    49 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 5:20 pm
    some of these are opinion and not really proved. just a theory.

    plus. its a movie..

  36. Profile photo of thetoastking
    thetoastking Male 18-29
    625 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 6:32 pm
    someone doesnt like sci-fi films.. except 2001 of course. everyone loves that film.
  37. Profile photo of TheGrag
    TheGrag Male 13-17
    1497 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 8:30 pm
    what....what?! NOOO!! GET IT OFF ME! AHHH!!
  38. Profile photo of jdf2k7
    jdf2k7 Male 13-17
    325 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 8:31 pm
    thats what make sci-fi films

    why would you want to see one where the people say:
    `shoot that ship over there!`
    `we cant captain no oxygen in space` )-|

  39. Profile photo of Trexa
    Trexa Female 18-29
    283 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 9:31 pm
    yeah... if the movie makers followed these laws of science, the movies would suck arse.
  40. Profile photo of Blakcat71388
    Blakcat71388 Female 18-29
    876 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 9:33 pm
    That was a good thought-provoking list.. I enjoyed it. But it`s science -fiction-, so there really can`t be any errors, can there?
  41. Profile photo of catbarf
    catbarf Male 18-29
    1455 posts
    November 24, 2007 at 10:01 pm
    They missed the obvious:

    Lasers make no sound, and cannot be seen.

    Seriously, that aggravates me every time...

  42. Profile photo of LittleMissQT
    LittleMissQT Female 18-29
    1266 posts
    November 25, 2007 at 12:21 am
    The best part of that post was the nerd debate at the end. Don`t get those sci fi geeks started!
  43. Profile photo of sidran32
    sidran32 Male 50-59
    42 posts
    November 25, 2007 at 12:23 am
    It`s science fiction. I don`t care if they fudge realism for the sake of the movie, that`s kind of the point. These are the people who don`t have an imagination or sense of humor. Dumb article.
  44. Profile photo of VikingGuy
    VikingGuy Male 18-29
    2160 posts
    November 25, 2007 at 12:47 am
    They forget the greatest flaw of all in their beloved 2001...and that is,it was supposed to happen in 2001,and yet,here we are,still on earth,beating the piss out of our fellow man like a bunch of idiots with space exploration of little concern as it costs money to make it work
  45. Profile photo of CmdrBittles
    CmdrBittles Female 18-29
    1173 posts
    November 25, 2007 at 1:59 am
    Has anyone seen the movie `Sunshine`? It`s good. :)
  46. Profile photo of Ohnjaynb
    Ohnjaynb Male 18-29
    594 posts
    November 25, 2007 at 8:56 am
    there are so many other real mistakes in movies. If a spaceship has gravity, then they are making us assume, there is some new technology keeping them on the floor. It`s very disappointing that they failed to note things like, the way cpr magically revives anyone(whether or not they`re in cardiac arrest), or the way defibrillators magically do the same thing. Also, how about the myth that your blood will boil in space--blood vessles are strong enough to keep the pressure up inside so blood won`t boil. There are even scenes in which a tiny hole in a spacecraft starts sucking everything out. Sea level pressure--and such a pressure in space is usually unnecessary to breath--is only 14.7psi. When a fluid flows through an orifice, the fastest speed at which is can transmit pressure is Mach1. So, air only travels through the hole that fast. That limits the flow rate through the hole(it`s called a choked flow if you wanna read up). Any of these would have been a better topic to choose from.
  47. Profile photo of shishkabob
    shishkabob Male 13-17
    180 posts
    November 25, 2007 at 10:45 am
    ok... so what this guy says, is that Star Wars would be SOOOO much better if its really really long space battle scenes were completly silent and had no eplosions. ya a good 20 minute long death star battle niiiice and silent just the way i like it. and no explosion after luke destroys it
  48. Profile photo of evilducky00
    evilducky00 Male 18-29
    430 posts
    November 25, 2007 at 9:25 pm
    take out the explosions and the movies suck! F UCK real I go see movies to see fake SH IT
  49. Profile photo of 29ptatos
    29ptatos Male 13-17
    1 post
    November 25, 2007 at 9:30 pm
    Now let us complain about the fact that no action movie or any movie based in a fictional world for that matter ignores the laws of physics, science, and in most cases reality. It`s called fiction for a reason if you want realisim watch documentrys or simply observe people.
  50. Profile photo of esopillar34
    esopillar34 Male 18-29
    471 posts
    November 25, 2007 at 10:13 pm
    Firefly did the whole "no sound in space" thing really well. And no sound in space =|= complete silence. You can have background music, you know.
  51. Profile photo of Fuego
    Fuego Male 40-49
    1287 posts
    November 25, 2007 at 11:05 pm
    Kubrick wasn`t the man...well, not for 2001 anyway. You can thank Arthur C Clarke for the scientific accuracy in that collaboration. The standard line of "the book was better" can only be multiplied in this case.

    Check out the guy`s CV at the Arthur C Clarke Foundation`s website.

  52. Profile photo of kongen
    kongen Male 18-29
    266 posts
    November 26, 2007 at 3:48 am
    2 bad 2001 is the single most boring movie in the history of man and aliens.
  53. Profile photo of jhonmayer1
    jhonmayer1 Male 18-29
    1289 posts
    December 1, 2007 at 1:49 am
    that is why they cal it science FICTION.
  54. Profile photo of BC_Cutie
    BC_Cutie Female 18-29
    2 posts
    December 2, 2007 at 5:12 am
    Wow, that was lame. With the exception of #1, all of these are conjecture. Not real errors, just generizations about the Reality and Space and stereotyped Sci-Fi, coming from the authors head. Weak. Really, really Weak.

    One star for the retard that wrote this.

Leave a Reply