Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
I was just saying it to make a point cuz had I seriously made that statement, lunatics would have been all over me about pushing my beliefs on others etc etc etc.
I`m making no arguments for or against anything.
oh and broadway love... EVIDENCE of GOD is an OXIMORON
What if I were to say something along the lines of Dumbasses, not believing in God when there is so much evidence out there. But I guess it`s your immortal soul that`s at stake so be stupid with it all you want...
pushing the fact that you don`t believe in God or Aliums on everyone else is as bad as them showing up at your door and pushing God and Aliums on you.
people who are dumb enough to use religion and aliens to explain things are simply ignorant and retarded. They are the people who are slowing down our evolution.
not that i can do anything about it and also i also believe in aliens but i just dont like how people use them to explain everything
You are a child, and you argue like one. Research each topic for more than 2 minutes and you can find that a) their originating sources are unreliable b) most of them have already been proven fictitious, so we don`t have to.
See, this is where you`re going wrong in your assumption that geological dating techniques are potentially flawed.
There is no debate among the respected, well-published, peer-reviewed scientific community that any of this creationist bull$hite has any scientific merit whatsoever. Don`t talk about "articles published in Scientific journals".
When one (just one! I`m holding my breath here!) is published in Nature, Science, or any one of hundred other international, respected scientific Journals (e.g. Geology, Proceedings of the Royal Academy, take your pick), then I`ll start to take it seriously.
I could write an article on the Tooth Fairy and have it published in a so-called "Scientific Journal". I`d probably be given a podium on Answersingenesis.org. Wouldn`t make it right though.
Wise up, wanker.
1) That the rate of decay has been constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances in the specimen dated have not been altered during its history by addition or removal of either parent or daughter isotopes 3) That when the rock first formed it contained a known amount of daughter material ("Radioisotopes and the age of the earth" pg v)
yes, it`s an article written by a creation-ist, but it gives more food for thought on the whole "Scientific Dating Methods are innacurate" theories becuase it gives evidence and then it cites the source. Many of them are articles published in Scientific journals.
Remember, everyone, take it all with a grain of salt. In one hundred years our great great grandchildren will be laughing at us for things that we
Good to see I`m not the only here one scanning the horizon (with my sniper rifle) for young-earth creationists who are drawn to this kind of bunk like flies around $hite.
Having said that, most of the children (13-17 years old) on here seem drawn to the aliens/time travel hypothesis. Equally idiotic as young-earth creationism, but without the agenda. You know what I mean.
And the fossilized handprint? Lots of animals have similar makes... who`s to say that it`s human?
but this logic isnt any better than the "stubborn, close minded" manner they accuse religions of."we found a human hand in a fossil. but we say the fossil was over 1 million years old! there MUST have been humans back then, because we said so!"is not much different than "there is no such thing as evolution because the Bible says so! there MUST have been a creation!"both of them start with one belief, and assume other things using information from that belief.
Secondly the people saying that these things have been dated wrong, im not disagreeing with you, but the methods of dating rocks is pretty sure fire.
The most likely explanation is just a coincidence of nature, look at how complex and coincidental any life forms existence is, and how all our organs rely on each other to keep us alive, now compared to that, is it really so unbelievable that spheres turn up with markings
Except the Costa Rica balls. Those are lifesize models of my own.
It makes a lot more sense than aliens or time travel or that humans once knew how to make a copper pot and somehow forgot or whatever unlikely scenario that UFOists come up with.
As a race we are good at spotting patterns where there are none. The handprint looks vaguely human. Look closer and it`s a pretty wierd shape - it could have been caused by anything, but as human`s we see something human!
The battery and the gears could well have been exactly as described. The idea that new technology is progress and should be shared around is a modern one. In the past new technology was considered frightening and possibly witchcraft - a very good reason to keep a clever new idea - such as electricity - hidden. Others things on the list have already been described here as hoaxes and natural phenomena.
As for the big balls. Well they sum it up really. The whole thing is a big pile of balls.
1. Aliens2. another race before dinosaurs3. some of those things could be natural (hey it could happen)4. it is all a hoax and humans are just a bunch of stupid monkies that will believe anything another monkey tells them.(after all we do have GODS and they are just some another monkey told us was there)
So are we just stupid monkies are is it something else you choose because I do not think there is a wrong answer to all of this it is just what you choose is right.
1) time travel is possible, and people are forgetful about where they leave objects2) aliens have visted the planet countless number of times and will eventually come back when they think we have advanced ourselves enough3) the ancient civilizations were actually quite advanced, but the humans that destroyed said civilizations were greedy bastards who were stupid and didnt understand.
yes we ALL know EXACTLY what film you`re talking about :P
These artifacts tho... scary stuff. Was probably aliens, I`m guessing.
Impossible fossils: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrosomato...
.For more info, look for `out of place artifacts` in Wikipedia.
The Antikythera mechanism, a geared device manufactured ca. 100 BCE, believed to be a device for predicting the motion of the sun, moon and planets i.e. an orrery.
Grooved (Klerksdorp) Sphere: Cairncross (1988) and Heinrich (1997, 2007), who have personally studied these objects, have argued that these objects are not manufactured, but the result of natural processes.
Dropa Sphere: All that exists of the supposed alien disks are several wide-angle photographs. The disks photographed, firstly, do not match the described "30 cm disks"; the disks photographed are very large. Secondly, the photos show none of the supposed deep grooves. Finally, absolutely no photos, descriptions, analyses or any other evidence of the actual `alien script` appear anywhere at all.
The Dropa Stones:There is no commonly accepted evidence that any such beings existed or any such landings occurred.
The Ica Stones:Proven fake
The Antikythera Mechanism:Real
The Baghdad Battery:Most likely a papyrus scroll storage
The Coso Artifact:A sparkplug from 1920
Ex. they found a dinosaur bone in this rock... and in the same aged rock they found a metal bowl. Ergo it`s f*ckin old ass bowl!
1. Timetravels are a55holes who dont understand the butterfly effect.2. Scientists are wrong with the datings.3. Humans have existed for that long
I think its number 2...So if they`re wrong with this stone; how can you trust them to be right with other things?
Oh well.. I forgive them; they have not seen mine yet.