`Last Supper` Hidden Images

Submitted by: Snoogans 9 years ago
http://www.news.com.au/comments/0,23600,22138621-13762,00.html

Guy claims to have found hidden images in the Leonardo da Vinci painting. Can you see them?
There are 84 comments:
Male 516
This is stupid.
0
Reply
Male 876
An elf?
0
Reply
Female 2,084
it`s just a bunch of blur for me.
0
Reply
Female 1,397
...and?
0
Reply
Male 382
Pff, like a rorshack test - whatever you want to see, you see.
0
Reply
Female 136
I personally don`t care.
I actually can`t believe i actually looked at it.
0
Reply
Female 184
that was absolutely retarded, just some idiot trying to get attention by making something out of nothing.
0
Reply
Male 57
What a dyke..This whole Da Vinci code crap is getting on my nerves..There was a movie with a pretty good theroy, wonderful now give it a rest people
0
Reply
Female 1,025
whatever!!!
0
Reply
Female 30
... I`m pretty sure da Vinci never meant for this painting to have secret images or meanings. ...It`s a painting, people. Leave it alone already.
0
Reply
Male 1
Well, that was a couple minutes of my life I`m never getting back.
0
Reply
Female 1,062
Oh brother. Of course if you superimpose a reverse image on top of the original it`s going to look different. A six-year-old could figure that out.
0
Reply
Male 54
that sucks. lame.
0
Reply
Female 192
"The Da Vinci Code is fiction. Stop acting like everything said in it is true. You might as well claim that everything in the bible is true..."

Way to get that religion argument started.

0
Reply
Male 10
By that i mean the movie.
with the computery stuffs
0
Reply
Male 10
Wow. It was cooler in The DaVinci Code. A LOT cooler.
0
Reply
Female 164
The Da Vinci Code is fiction. Stop acting like everything said in it is true. You might as well claim that everything in the bible is true...
0
Reply
Male 988
ever read the Da Vinci Code? There are supposedly MANY hidden messages in the Last Supper
0
Reply
Female 304
I could see the baby, but not the person in red clothing.
0
Reply
Female 182
uhhh...is he tom hanks??
0
Reply
Male 62
JESUS LOOKS UGLY

[now christians, and everyone else should fight, so in 2 days, ill be entertained]

GO GO

0
Reply
Male 240
Even if there is a picture of like, jesus or that weird ass man in red robes...
HOW DOES THIS CHANGE ANYTHING IN THE REAL WORLD???
0
Reply
Female 878
Lol, the first thing I thought when I saw the link was "This better not be a screamer."
0
Reply
Female 552
Ok some guy fliped a famous old painting and put them together and AMAZINGLY found nothing. Woohoo. -_-
0
Reply
Female 406
...just no.
0
Reply
Male 1,386
umm it says the picture should be symmetrical... and it is. the "mary holding a baby" is on both sides, same with the "figure in red robes." i dont know what they`re smoking :/
0
Reply
Male 140
SpoonFork! High five for the Adam Sandler movie quote!
0
Reply
Female 1,007
They didn`t point out that JESUS LOOKS LIKE SATAN.

And now I`m going to hell. :-(

0
Reply
Female 576
i`m sick of people trying to say things about this stupid painting. it`s beautiful, but it`s not like da vinci was there. this is just his interpretation of what happened.

and i really doubt he made `hidden figures` because heknew people would be distorting the image.. lol

0
Reply
Male 756
Finally, I can see clearly now.

I can see Curly from The Three Stooges sitting at both ends of the table. He is saying, "Yuk! Yuk! Yuk!"

I can see a punk with a red mohawk haircut sitting where the baby appears to be.

I can see a leprechaun on the rear wall above the window. It is not wearing a hat.

Jesus now has clevage.

This is so stupid, it will likely be on ebay tomorrow.

0
Reply
Male 459
<fade in>

Leonardo da Vinci is standing in his studio talking to another fellow. Two copies of "The Last Supper" are nearby.

Leonardo: I`ve been experimenting with this painting. I`m going to try something and I want your opinion.

Leonardo picks up one painting, reverses it and lays it over top of the other painting.

Leonardo: Now, tell me what you see.

Other fellow: Umm... the back of the canvas.

Leonardo: Exactly! That`s why this is the dumbest idea I`ve ever had.

<fade out>

0
Reply
Male 319
Neo, what exactly are you basing that supposition on? What research have you done to make such a claim?

My guess is like most people on the internet, all you`re doing is repeating what some other random person had said as if there is an ounce of credence to the statement.

0
Reply
Female 6
I can see two spartans, one on each side of Jesus
0
Reply
Female 101
Seems like somebody is just trying too hard to prove something.
0
Reply
Male 67
I think Da Vinci was a very clever and spiritual man, in touch with every sort of religion, and probably quite psychic. (im not religious by the way) I just think Da Vinci conveyed his findings through his paintings etc. (when i say findngs i mean spiritual facts) Wow.
0
Reply
Male 4,393
Interesting...
0
Reply
Female 426
retarded
0
Reply
Female 1,134
i dont know about anyone but all i see a face on the bottom left corner and i honistly dont know if other people have seen it too or not.
0
Reply
Male 869
Hey what the hell Buddy.....I didn`t even submit this article. I submitted one from MSNBC.com about how this guys web site crashed because of it. Oh well...
0
Reply
Male 5,970
This guy watched to much of the Da Vinci code and the pictures impossible to see
0
Reply
Male 742
I FOUND A DISEMBODIED HAND WITH A DAGGER!
0
Reply
Male 4,012
some people will see anything they WANT to see.
0
Reply
Male 334
i found it creepy that Jesus looked like a demon when they mixed the reversed image with the original image O.o
0
Reply
Female 1,412
I dont get it...
0
Reply
Male 1,420
""Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.""
uh, a simple "no" would have sufficed, but thank you.
(i may be paraphrasing)
0
Reply
Male 97
They stole this idea from me when I super imposed Norman Rockwell paintings
to get the image of them doin` it.
0
Reply
Male 292
if your going to waste your time on this crap dont you think getting a felt pen and just scrawling `jesuz wuz er` would be equally as effective and authentic. come on people an artist 1500 odd years after the event, bang no credability. and as for this nonsense im sure if you super impossed the pictures of the last supper over those of 1966 world cup final and if you looked at it really closely for a while i bet you would start to develop a headache.
0
Reply
Male 256
this makes no sence, of corse there soing to be new figures, the figure is red robes, was alreade there on the left before the flip, and there surprised its on the other side after?!!? same with the figure holding the baby, after the flip, there was two. this is bullpoo
0
Reply
Male 232
Hey guys, if you turn your head slightly and squint, you can see that Jesus is actually David Hasselhoff!!
0
Reply
Female 89
I think not...
0
Reply
Female 1,470
I dont even see anything...just some screwed up picture. Waste of time.
0
Reply
Female 525
AHHHHH sublimnal MESSAGESS!! *screams and runs away*
0
Reply
Female 164
This is a miracle! I never knew that photoshop was available in the fifteenth century, so that Leonardo would have any idea that six hundred years later we`d be able to flip his painting and superimpose it on itself! What next, Jesus road into town on a jet plane? I wouldn`t doubt it! God`s power knows no limits!
0
Reply
Male 195
this is as worse than that backwards song i posted long ago `ooh i can see a figure in red robes who was already there before i must tell the world.` how on earth did it get on the news?
0
Reply
Male 2,510
the comment are funnier than the image.
0
Reply
Male 756
I just super-imposed Bill and Hillary into one picture (which was a feat in itself, I might add). It showed them having sex.

Then I superimposed a reverse image of that picture onto itself.

I then saw all of the ugly that Chuck Norris has kicked off of people in the last 40 years... that`s a lot of ugly... but then, Chuck`s a lot of man.

0
Reply
Male 2,510
its not going to be perfectly symetrical when u have different people on each side, you`ve flipped the image and tried to paste it on top of the original.
0
Reply
Male 756
^davymid - good one!

I think we should all superimpose reverse images of all pictures and paintings (private, public, known and unknown) to see if we can find anything else that has been hidden for years.

People like this who can make something out of nothing are just amazing!

0
Reply
Male 12,138
No hold on, sorry, my mistake. It`s Bob Barker.
0
Reply
Male 12,138
I just scanned my arse, and flipped it, and as if by magic appeared the face of Mother Theresa!
0
Reply
Male 2,796
I guess the question is if Da Vinci would have had the foresight and know-how to paint something that could reveal different images if it were so strenuously distorted. My money is on "no".

However, I am waiting for more. Da Vinci certainly was a strange fellow who thought outside the box to say the least. As a society, we have found evidence of indoor plumbing dating back two thousand years...so why not?

BTW my bet is 233 posts.

0
Reply
Male 521
okay...all hes done is overlap it..
0
Reply
Male 277
errrrrr...what`s wrong now?
0
Reply
Male 211
its...... CURSED!!!!!
0
Reply
Male 234
AH YEAH, it all makes sense! I understand it all now! it changed my life!!

no rly, I didn`t even see anything.

0
Reply
Female 781
This is incredibly stupid. It`s the same as playing "Stairway to Heaven" backward and hearing satanic messages. Of course if you distort something, you can read anything you want into it.

featherstorm, that would have been so much more awesome.

0
Reply
Male 1,265
"Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
0
Reply
Female 94
i was hoping it would be like a hightlights magazine... with the hidden pictures... where you have to find the octupus and the shovel and the frying pan... *sigh*
0
Reply
Female 44
Well that`s just stupid. I saw those figures, but I don`t understand what`s so great or amazing about them.
0
Reply
Male 294
houseonfire0, no kittyology is the right religion.


0
Reply
Male 2,567
I can`t see poo
0
Reply
Male 319
Wow houseonfire, that was the most pointless response to a post I`ve ever read.

As for the subject at hand...

It`s human nature to try to find order and patterns in chaos. This is why people tend to spot human faces in carpet or stucco ceilings. This is no different, really. Someone is trying to find something of interest in a very beautiful and renowned painting but are forgetting that if you really want to see something, chances are you will - even if it`s actually there or not.

0
Reply
Male 11
Bullpoo. Jewish is the right religion.
Christianity and Catholicism are both stupid and meaningless
0
Reply
Male 341
That was weird... But I still love the painting.
0
Reply
Female 1,832
All it is, is overlapping images, how dumb.
0
Reply
Female 1,172
This was stupid. OoOOOooooOoOO overlapping images make new ones....OoOOOoOoOoOooo
0
Reply
Male 232
Why is this painting so important, Da Vinci wasn`t there. How the hell would he know?
0
Reply
Male 42
Anyone wanna make any bets on how many comments there will be in 2 days? over arguing over religion.

I bet over 120... anyone think different?

0
Reply
Male 994
Interesting concept... But I don`t think we were meant to probe that deeply.
0
Reply
Female 338
I guess you could see it...If anyone could do something like that, especially back then, it was Da Vinci. That crazy prankster...
0
Reply
Male 139
Too much for my brain at this hour, I`ll check in later.
But then again, this is totally pointless.
0
Reply
Female 103
I couldn`t see it very well. And the third picture just made me dizzy.
0
Reply
Female 1,596
o.0 I can`t see the images
If it was a lot clearer it might help -.-
0
Reply
Male 869
Link: `Last Supper` Hidden Images [Rate Link] - Guy claims to have found hidden images in the Leonardo da Vinci painting. Can you see them?
0
Reply