Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
instead of the girl giving birth to a daughter with 50% of her DNA she will give birth to a daughter with between 0-50% of her DNA, depending on the egg.
the effect of this is:the baby will share a greater % of its genes with the grandmother. the baby will probably share a lesser % of its genes with its mother. the baby will not be genetically related to one of her grandfathers.
the biological grandfather is separated from the grandmother anyway
this would mean a greater biological bond with the birthmother than adoption / anonymous eggs
people give birth to their sisters children frequently (even happened on friends i think)while this situation is different, it is not dissimilar.
***AND ALL THAT DOESNT MATTER ATALL IF THE DAUGHTER CHOOSES TO NOT HAVE KIDS/ADOPT/TAKE ANONYMOUS EGGS
-to a couple of people above: this is in canada, not englandwe didnt come from 2 peopl
wel basically what im sayin is that i think this same thing is gonna happen if the girl does use her mothers eggs.
Ye, ye, how nobel and all, but genetically, its just not right.
The daughter`s DNA won`t come into play at all, so you don`t have to worry about that.
And rambozo, I don`t think he ate his twin. His twin just ended up inside him several months before birth and kept growing like a parasite.
It was embarrassing when my mom made me wear her old sneakers to gym class once. Do you know how embarrassing it would be to have you mom freeze her EGGS to be put in you later?
anyway the girl is only seven right now.when she`s older she can just decide to adopt, or get eggs from a different woman besides her mother. it`s her decision if she wants them or not.
Her mum was just like any other egg donor, she just happened to be her mother. Children don`t suffer from identity problems if they were born from an egg donor`s eggs, they call the woman that gave birth to them their mum. SOmetimes they don`t ever even see the woman that donated the eggs.
Okay, so if the daughter uses her mothers eggs, then the child will see his grandmother, but I still don`t see what`s so `wrong` about it...
And how could it be embarrasing for the kid? No one can tease him about it unless she/he willingly tells them. And he`s not gonna do that if he`s really embarrased about it and doesn`t wanted to be teased...
And the child wouldn`t be the sibling of it`s mother, just a half-sibling. Ummm... I dunno if that`s any better for any of you guys, just wanted to point it out.
So yeah... sorry, this is so long... I always manage to ramble on for ages. So I`ll shut up.
No, robofish, the human race started with SEVEN.
Only if you believe in Adam and Eve...And not all of us do.
That must suck for her :/
I have it myself and I completely empathise with these people`s situation, but personally I would opt for an anonymous egg as the emotional implications could be tough
not want to have kids(which I find is very honourable)
the disease name is Androgen insensitivity syndrome.
They`re giving a retard midget the chance to give birth to a baby.
just some mother helping her sick daughter
The girl still has the option to adopt later but at least she can make her own choice rather than regretting her mother not giving her the chance.
Having more than two children increases the population. Having two keeps things status-quo. Having only one reduces the population. Who knows how many children this little girl will choose to have when she is older. She may choose to have 20, she may choose to have only one. Hell, she may even choose to have none. Nobody knows. So please save your ranting for an appropriate moment?! Oh yes, and possibly learn how to post a thought in an intelligent way without putting others down.
Give me a drating break you stupid breeders. Selfish drating people. The reason the drating earth is populated by stupid drating non-nice individuals. THERE CAN BE MORE TO LIFE THAN JUST HAVING CHILDREN. You people who say that this is not the case deserve to rot in hell for this stupid ass genetic tampering you condone.
I`m so drating sick of poor ass stupid people having babies SIMPLY because, "There is no bond greater..." WAH WAH! Then you know what, you don`t get my drating welfare.
And Robofish, no we didn`t.
It`s not that adoption is bad or wrong adoption is a very wonderful thing. But it`s not the same as having your own child. Having something live insdie for 9 month dependent on you for survivial. The maternal bonding of mother and child before the mother even sees the childs face oe the true sex. The pure love of being a mother.
It`s something most people my age wouldn`t understand. I think what the mother is doing is very kind of her but if the daughter does become infertile someday she mighb e better off getting eggs from another donor only because there could be bad repercussions (i know i spelled it wrong) with the DNA being so close together with mother and daughter. That would be my only concern
okay I wasnt
But I would have if you didn.t
I was so confused then... But this is what they are talking about!
some people feel their life is not complete until they have children, there is no bond or connection greater, and adopting, though better than nothing, is not the same at all and if there is an option to actually conceive a child, as long as it is willing it is ok, and should not be knocked down (or up as the case may be!)
"Because the human race started as just two people."
Yeah, isn`t it funny the Church condemns incest and yet they wish to accept a literal interpretation of the Bible? Trust me, religion makes much more sense when one accepts it`s inherently contradictory in practice and inherently ignorant in principle.
"Hey mom, I might be infertile."
"Oh, don`t worry, you can have some of my eggs, honey. That way you can have kids of your own -- only, they`ll be.. You know, your sibling.. Or something.."
Mental retardation here we come!