Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
Would oyu mind pushing the f*cking Caps Lock button? Even your name is in caps, ya dumb noob.
You are another one who needs help with reality. Help me to understand, if your only reliable source for information is from CNN, then why would you bother reading anything on the internet.
Victoryrider - "I think they have had the cure for years (Whether it`s this or not). Cancer is an effective means of population control, so they continue to use it." Cancer as an effective means of population control! You just like to hear yourself talk don`t you? Because if you actually believe that you are the most cretinous excuse of a human that I have had the displeasure of meeting. It is not even worth my time trying to point out the the phallacies of your argument.
Im wondering who helped you with the big words, your four year old nephew? It said in very plain english that it turned on the mitochondria which also turns on the cell`s ability to self destruct. Has nothing to due with the military industrial complex or any other conspiracy crap. Abnormal cells self-destruct, normal cells continue to replicate. No cancer.
"There are countless compounds that can do the same thing that never turn into viable treatments."
If the United States does not find an immediate way to make money off the product, they will not jump in to make it available to the public. Only if they have full patent for the drug, and if they can introduce it to the FDA for futher analysis and claim it as "ours", and sell it at an extremely expensive price, THEN the US will jump in that bandwagon and sell it here. Otherwise, there`s no money in it.
Same thing with solar power. The technology is THERE. Cars that run on water-fuel are THERE. Some are being used in Northern regions of the hemisphere. BUT NOT HERE. WHY? The freaking United States of Greedy America wants to keep us dependent on OIL. That`s a money maker right there.
We live and breathe money. That`s what it all comes down to. Sad.
Anyway, the article is interesting, and I do hope that it`s true.
my aunt died of breast cancer (and my mother came down with type II late june. her hairs starting to grow back!), but she always says if her sister were alive today, she would have survived it. Its comforting to know that if i inherit it, the technology by then should make it curable, if not easier.
Here`s some info from the MSN article, so acording to this skeptist view it could only work in rats, or it could be viable, we don`t know, the MSN article notes that due to the extremely small molecular size, it gives it a better potential effectivness when compared to most other false hits that only worked in rats.
I LIKE AM BECAUSE MY NANA WAS AN HERBALIST AND SHE USED NATURAL REMEDIES TO CURE ILLNESSES.I REMEMBER SHE USED TO SAY CANARY SEED FOR HIGH-BLOOD PRESSURE. THIS PLANT CALLED MARRUFO FOR GASTRITIS I THINK, DAMN I CAN`T REMEMBER ANYMORE. I WAS LIKE 10YRS OLD.
That`s because it`s unpatented. when it`s proven to work for humans AND patented, the news people`s sponsers will jump to make money off of it.
I just hope it`s true, now at this moment i don`t even care about the cancer-rats. Poor them.
you`re a fu-cking idiot
UH did you even read the article? that isn`t how it works
"Shame on the U.S.A. Your people are too fat and lazy to help themselves. Your people are too poor to pay for their own health car. The govenment should do it for you for free. So you can have the great health care the rest of the world has." Yipee.
Blah Blah Blah. Flame away....
hope they get the funding for the trials.
Even more amazing is that I live like... 2 blocks from that university and I`m going there next year. That stuff should be on our news way more often.
That`s f0cked up.
..I don`t know the site.. is it credible or not?