XBOX 360 vs PS3 vs Wii

Submitted by: buddy 10 years ago in Tech
http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?type=mov&id=15368

Same game on all three.
There are 131 comments:
Male 208
360 rapes
0
Reply
Male 32
The graphics on the ps3 look identical to my cr*ppy ps2, x360 pwns all
0
Reply
Male 693
and*. ha.
0
Reply
Male 693
Xbox 360 looked better than all of them- I haven`t noticed the blurriness of the Wii until now. Geez. lol, but I`m a proud Wii amd Xbox 360 owner anyway. lol
0
Reply
Male 68
The Wii is easily the best. My m8 got one. Played on it for about 10 minutesand i was hooked. Yeh i may not have the grapics the biggest ram or whatever but it`s wayyyy more fun than the other two. So i think that Wii is the Best. But then i don`t have much care for graphics unlike my brother to whom graphics are everything
0
Reply
Male 52
hey guys check out this site kool website here make surteto leave a rating for the site and a comment in the guestbook
0
Reply
Male 1,496
Wii looked like an N64 game.
0
Reply
Male 56
ps: i have a 360
0
Reply
Male 56
ok, long story short: SCREW MOTION SENSITIVITY!!!
nobody will probably ever read this but i`d rather sit on the couch knowing all of the usuall button positions then having to remember the whole new demension added by having to move the controller around. I`d probably make mistakes by accidentally moving the controller in some way anyway. In the video the 360 looked pretty good, the ps3 was ok but it was too @#$%-ing bright, and the wii looked, well.... bad. its probably mostly the way they recorded the wii portion. Most peope are forgetting that the wii also needs time for developers to improve its graphics, and almost nobody pointed out that the 360 needs time to improve although it has been out for a year. If you look at the upcoming title for the xbox: unreal championship 2007 (or something like that) you`ll see how much the graphics have gotten better compared to the launch titles, I just wanted to use that as a comparison of how much better wii/ps3 will look im a year or two
0
Reply
Female 243
go xbox go!
0
Reply
Female 152
Okay, I know this was posted a long time ago but it still pisses me off all the same:

""Wii SUCS!!!!!!!!!!!!I am getting a PS3.even though for me it was a close between PS3 & Xbox360"
Exactly what I`d expect a female to say.

If you didn`t notice, Nintendo`s console is like 3 times cheaper than either the PS3 or 360, plus its aiming for gameplay, not graphics.

Do your research before you judge on one viewing alone."

A female, huh? And I bet that you think we`ll be too busy judging controllers because we`re painting our nails. Next time you make a decision that it happened only because a female did it, read the many posts of guys saying they like it based of graphics alone.

0
Reply
Male 701
the 360 look so much better than the ps3. but the wii kicks so much fkn ass
0
Reply
Male 332
With the Wii they were probably using the component cables that ship with the console. Composite cables (about 20$) will increase the res to 480p (dvd quality).
0
Reply
Male 332
The Wii does have the first truly motion sensing controller. Duck hunt was based on the light gun, which had a color sensor built in (you could win at duck hunt by shooting a black t-shirt) And duck hunt is one of the best gameplay experiences I`ve ever had. I still pop it in from time to time. Also, the PS3 controller detects motion, but the Wiimote can calculate its exact position and orientation in 3D space. To boot, I haven`t had a single problem with a nintendo system to date. Hell, my 16 year old NES works great.
0
Reply
Female 178
I`d rather have an Xbox 360.
0
Reply
Male 59
All I know is Perfect Dark Zero (esp. multiplay)and Dead Rising have great gameplay and are X360 exclusives. =) And are so far are the only two X360 games I`ve played.
0
Reply
Male 99
The PS3 killed the 360 in all but the last bit of gameplay.
However. Graphics and XBL is all the 360 has on its side. The PS3 has great and free online, great graphics, a motion sensing controller, and way more exclusively awesome games. The Wii also has a lot of exclusives, some of which are good, and was the Wiimote and Nunchuck.
I saw it`s way too early to start comparing them together. The PS3 has had only three weeks to get its stuff together, as with the Wii, whereas the 360 came far earlier and knew how to work its graphics engine. It`s hardly fair to start comparing them when the two new consoles are just trying out new things. Apparently all MS focuses on is high graphic levels, and online. Sony and Ninty both work on graphics, and also try to bring in revolutionary gameplay.
Why do you think the 360`s been out for a year? Because MS wanted to beat competition when it arose because they had a year headstart.But on the ohter hand, PS3 has a other 360-graphic killing ga
0
Reply
Male 52
xbow wins no doubt, but id take the wii second just because the concept of using the nunchuck controller as a gun is cool even if it isn`t a new idea (for those who think motion sensetive controllers are new check out duck hunting for the nes) and of coures the ps3 stinks its only a little bit more powerfull than the xbox, but almost double the price
0
Reply
Female 943
xbox = best
P3 = better
Wii = worst
0
Reply
Male 986
my brother keeps saying that he want a stupid 360...why? cuz of graphics..... dude, chill out, its a few pieces of grass that look werid on the wii that will make it a crappy console... and the lines on the wii were cause its was a bad TV...
0
Reply
Male 148
Xbox- Dead in 2 months. =(- Returned and got Zen:Vision M, Mp3 Player
Gamecube still going- 1 year old on xmas though
Ps2- still kicking over 4 years. Takes a bit to read games(2minutes maby) but it still works fine other then that.

Got a wii too but can`t play it till x mas.

0
Reply
Male 924
me too fermented i havent got any of the new consoles yet but i`ve preordered a wii and it should be delivered by christmas
its gonna be the best christmas EVER
eyesore`s right sony are always ripping off nintendo and they dont even do it well

ninty`s wiimote and nunchuk combo: 3 axis of sensing each, meaning it knows whether its tipped forward or back, side to side up and down, theres about 5 million odd positions it can detect

PS3: barely even senses movement, and i havent seen a single game that uses it well or at all

play zelda, its like you are actually holding links sword or hook shot or whatever, wii sports, in boxing it follows your moves exactly. now THAT makes something lifelike, graphics, don`t.

i had an xbox and it was absolutely crap, so i swapped it for a gamecube and it has been great.

0
Reply
Female 797
XBOX 360 looks like it has better graphics than the other 2.
0
Reply
Female 170
Ps3 sucks. I still can`t believe they ripped off Nintendo`s motion sensing controller. Yes, Nintendo gets ripped off by Sony... now where have I heard that before... oh yes ALL THE TIME.
0
Reply
Male 59
Oh, BTW:

XBox 360 has 3.2 GHz PowerPC with 3 dual-threaded processor cores and 3.2 GHz Cell processor with 7 single-threaded processing units cores (which are not directly comparable anyway). Besides that RAM and such are very nearly identical for both, and I still don`t get why everyone is wowed by the big numbers of cores the PS3 has.. Which are single instead of dual and not comparable anyway. I just think X360 and PS3 will probably even have some games that look better on one throughout their life depending on what system the development team intentionally or otherwise focuses on making beautiful. So it comes down to other stuff than technology for me.

And I used to think that I just needed a computer and of course when Half-Life Episode 2 comes out or if I want to play a strategy game, I`ll still use it quite a bit but games like Dead Rising and awesome to play on HDTV and the controller works good for it. (Probably a good idea to get rid of black and white buttons.)

0
Reply
Male 119
RyanF701

"Wii is defiantly made for gameplay and fun, if I want graphics I have a computer."

Exactly my point!

I am probably the one of the few on this forum that doesn`t own a new system yet, but I do know quite a bit for each of the systems.

Each is different and unique, the PS3 with insane power and Blue-Ray drives, X-Box with great graphical capabilty and FPS`s (though, the PS3 could outshine it, it was not so apparent in this video), and then there is the Wii.

The Wii is a new perspective on how to play your games, which is purely fun. Sure, it will not get you with it`s sub-par (with PS3 and X-Box 360 setting it) graphics, but what is has on its side is innovation.

To me, innovation is what keeps me from playing my P.C. (which I must say, can graphically match or beat any of the consoles anyway) all day, and this is what the videogame industry sorely needed, a fresh way to play and enjoy gaming.

+A work, Nintendo.

-Fermented

0
Reply
Male 733
change the settings on ur screen and the PS3 should be just perfect.
PS3 all the way
0
Reply
Female 80
I have a Wii and I love it.

For a while now, I`ve been thinking that I probably won`t get a PS3 until it`s extremely dirt cheap and actually works. If I ever decide to get one.

The 360 though, screw that. I had too much trouble with the Xbox to bother with them again. Maybe another 10 years down the road when they`ve actually figured out what they`re doing. Their controllers are horrible..

Anyway, if I want nice graphics, I do have a computer. Not that I care about graphics. I`m a huge mud fan after all. :)

0
Reply
Male 59
Agree with the Blu-ray thing, at first I thought it would be nice but I wonder how many people are actually going to buy Blu-Ray movies even with it available.. is it really worth that much more cost? Xbox 360 will be a little more competitive with them with their new attachable HD-DVD drive and downloadable HD content but to be honest I`m not so sure if the cost of all this high def stuff makes it that much better than the normal 480p that most video DVDs are in. I mean, on my screen, 480p DVDs look great anyway..

As for PS3 and Xbox 360, I think that the hardware is so different it`s hard to compare (apples to oranges) but I`d guess from what I`ve seen it looks about equal. And it seems most people think Xbox 360 graphics in games are better ATM.. PS3 will likely catch up in some time, but I doubt that it`ll have noticable performance differences. And unless you really like Blu-Ray it might not be worth the money. =( I`d rather have Xbox Live than Blu-Ray but oh well.

0
Reply
Male 1,141
this is stupid. you cant really compare Wii to the others with only graphics, although out of all of them XBOX360 did have the best. sadly simply judging by flashy graphics is not a good way to make a judgement on what next-gen system you should buy.
0
Reply
Male 407
The Blu-ray drive might have really drated them over. It`s still basically a proprietary format that may or may not even take off sucessfully. It may be another Beta-max on Sony`s resume. The problem with that is that the Bu-ray drive seems to be the most expensive part of the machine, if they opted not to use it, you could probably very easily find the Ps3 being at a competive price to the 360.
0
Reply
Male 42
sure, the PS3 looks better.

but not $600 worth of `better`

0
Reply
Male 161
Like I said before, the PS3 is barely more powerful than the Xbox360, that`s a fact, not to mention that it`s harder to develop for and what it can do on paper, is different than what developers will actually achieve. When it`s so hard to develop for, the better stats mean hardly anything.
0
Reply
Male 888
Its probably true that they had less time to work with the converting it to the PS3 and Wii to optimize them and everything, but its clear the Wii has limitations.
While the Wii is understandable, it hurts the PS3`s credibility - you`ve already paid over $600 for worse graphics than an easier-to-get 360 with all the bells and whistles (and games), or a Wii with the unique controllers at a fraction of the cost.

Though the PS3 would have probably reigned supreme if they had more time to work with it and pushed everything to its limits.

I also noticed that the Wii had a bad picture, it didn`t seem like intentional graphics but a refresh rate issue or something. I saw screen tearing and blockiness.

0
Reply
Male 85
Let me again reinterate, in case if anyone missed...
no way are these 3 on the same television, the wii has some small tv close to them *and* if anyone cares to look, it seems that when the 3 are being compared with each other for same time etc. i dare say that sometimes one is blurry when compared to others- probably due to speeding up or slowing down to make the whole thing seem more timed with the other cinema sequences. Furthermore this one game says very little regarding whatever it is these machines can do- it`s a very early 3rd party developer and owing to the 360 being created first it naturally has a lot more time allocated to fine tuning it. Give it 6 months and some new games and then we`ll be able to work out who`s graphics (if anything) are better.
0
Reply
Male 227
The only and ONLY way the PS3 would possible become appealing is if they dropped $300 off.
Also I just set up my Wii on my widescreen and it looks abosofrickinglutly amazing,
I highly doubt that they played the Wii on a good TV.
0
Reply
Male 59
Wii is pretty cheap though, yeah.. I think it would be something to consider getting later possibly used.. prices always go way down before you know it, seemingly.. Only thing is I don`t see anything I would play on it besides Twilight Princess.. $300 is a lot to spend to play a game, but I`ll wait and see. =(

And as those who say it`s not about the graphics, I love old games, of course, but there`s just something awesome and immersive about playing Half-Life 2 on a good computer or seeing the incredible detail possible in games like Dead Rising. (You can spend 10 minutes looking around at the shelves of some of the stores in that game if you get the chance, and all the stores in the mall are different.) But gameplay is most important factor and just like there`s different game genres, I can very much enjoy a simple game and turn around and be wowed by amazing graphics later. Who says art and games can`t be combined? =)

0
Reply
Male 919
Well while Suicism is taling about terraflops, let me point that the PS3 has Only 256 ram and The 360 has 512 ram.
0
Reply
Male 738
For $250 bucks, Wii is at an advantage. I`m not willing to sell myself into prostitution for the 600 smackers for a PS3.

If I wanted to look at pretty pictures, I would go to an art gallery. Not a PS3 or Xbox360. I don`t care about graphics as long as I can tell what the thing on the screen is. Fun trumps all other categories, at which the Wii excels.

0
Reply
Male 105
Whatever it is you want, have fun with it. period.
0
Reply
Male 407
I`m just not impressed with the Ps3 at all. Sure it came out later, but that just means developers had a whole extra year to work on thier games, and it looks like they just dicked around for 12 months. With the Ps3`s alleged raw power it should be literally raping the 360 but it`s not, and it won`t be. Ps3 fanboys love to point out that it`ll look better as time goes on. Some holds true for X-box and Wii, and I bet out of the three the Wii progresses the most quickly because it`s got much simpler hardware and sofware to work with. Either way, if I`m buying a system for 600 bucks I want it to be superior now, not in 5 years. Plus that`s one big mother drater, I would literally not have room to put it anywhere. If anything I would get a 360 and a Wii and still save some bills over that Ps3, cause if I wanted to get one now It`d be like finding Mary Magdalene`s used tampon unless I wanted to pay about 9 large. Whatever, come wake me up when the Ps3 is living up to it`s hype.
0
Reply
Male 1,289
awww...the poor wii....lol....just doesnt stand up to anything...its like...a little higher than gamecube graphics....lol....and i dont think the color was right for the ps3....xbox looked good though...but its all about the ps3! WOOOOO!!!!
0
Reply
Female 1,382
*Spits on Wii haters*
HAAAAAAAA...! *big breath*

...

WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! Can`t beat a Wii. Total Sega/Nintendo fan. (Yay Sonic 2006!)

0
Reply
Male 176
I only want Ps3 for MGS4
0
Reply
Male 59
And yeah, I kinda dislike Sony a lot now. DRM rootkit stuff, laptop battery recall, and they sued website that sold Japanese PSPs to European people. Not very consumer friendly. :( XBox Live is cool from what I`ve seen in Perfect Dark Zero.. I think Nintendo is a bit crazy too but one game I would love to try is Twilight Princess (used to play Zelda a ton), besides that not much.
0
Reply
Male 559
You people like to over analyze. This sucks, that`s better... They are all going to be fun to play.

With Twilight Princess, Wii has the best new game of the Decade. Nintendo has once again reinvented the way you play video games.

With it`s insane processing power, PS3 will look better than eihter of the others. Suck it up X-Box fan Boys, it has 8 processers and the hardware is superior, it looks better and there is nothing you can do or say to change that. Also, someone said PS didn`t have a problem with broken units when PS2 was released. That is only in your world, on earth, everyone has a problem with PS2 eventually, and my first PS was broken when I took it out of the box.

X-Box has the best online play and audio options at this point. They also have some extremely cool games that won`t be on the other 2 systems like Fight Night and Halo. Don`t know about Marvel ultimate alliance on other systems, but that game is great on 360.

I`m own a wii, and I may buy an 360.

0
Reply
Male 132
Gaming system... expensive multimedia device.... gaming system... expensive multimedia device.

Yup I`m getting the game system.

0
Reply
Male 59
Yeah I love the X360 graphics.. I was afraid that the PS3 might actually look better than X360, but firsthand all that hype seems to be nothing.. X360 looked better than PS3 a lot in this game. Now, Wii.. that`s kinda laughable. Graphics aren`t everything, but in a game like Call of Duty 3 I imagine a ton of the fun is feeling so immersed. I love my X360. =)
0
Reply
Male 2,486
Also, blood, gore and sex does not mean the game makes you mature by playing it, or games without it do not mean your a little kid.
0
Reply
Male 2,486
" The Wii is obviously a P.O.S."

You sir, are an idiot.

Your telling me you`d rather stare at a TV that looked pretty, and then be bored with it in 10 seconds and get tired of boring gameplay, rather than stare at a decent looking TV and be entertained for hours at a time?

Have fun..

0
Reply
Male 161
For the record, the PS3 barely beats out the Xbox 360, both excell in different categories and it`s safe to say they`re about even. The wii focuses more on Fun and not graphics. And how can people say that now the Wii is for everyone when before Nintendo was for kids, Nintendo has always been for everyone, hence the lake of M rated games, they know how to make fun games that everyone can enjoy, most of the time their games are better than the M rated games on the PS2 and Xbox 360 but fanboys are so blind and stupid that to them the fact that it`s rated M just happens to make it better. Also, look at the DS vs the PSP, it`s like the Wii vs PS3, DS had crappier graphics, less features, yet it constantly outsells the PSP everywhere, in some countries it outsells it 4:1 because it appeals to everyone, I think in the end it will work out like that with the Wii vs PS3, I` m not mentioned Xbox 360 in this war because Wii and Xbox 360 are at a truce.
0
Reply
Male 2,486
Wii is defiantly made for gameplay and fun, if I want graphics I have a computer.

360 definatly kicked everyones ass graphic wise, and it doesn`t cost 600$ and then 100$ a game, for `blu-ray` which almost no TVs can see anyway.

Whoever bought a PS3, grats on being scammed, if you think a Wii sucks, you dont deserve to have a console in the first place, graphics dont mean it`s a great game, i`d rather have fun doing something than staring at a screen that was pretty and I got bored of.

0
Reply
Male 18
So what im hearing is darker graphics=better graphics? Eh, im sticking with PS3, regardeless if being one year behind in the fight it doesnt look quite as nice as Xbox. Sony has all the best licenses, and thats all that really matters, graphics are purely secondary.
0
Reply
Male 30
Sponsored by Microsoft?

Seriously, this comparison heavily favors the 360.

The Wii can`t compete in pure graphical grunt at it`s price point, and is admittedly going for a totally different experience/audience.

The PS3 has more raw power than the 360. However, devs are still learning how to optimize their games for the system. It does have a distinct disadvantage in comparison to the year-old 360.

The difference should be mitigated in about 6-8 months, in which you will see the PS3 surpass the 360 in pure shininess.

Of course, A high-end PC is roughly equivilent to a 360/PS3 right now and in a year or so will put them both to shame.

So for me, the Wii is the only attractive option because I don`t need another PC-like machine. Most people don`t have the luxury of nice computers though, so the cheaper 360s/PS3s might be good in those situations.

0
Reply
Male 319
i hate how people can/will buy consoles based simply on graphics

games are to play, not to stare at, who cares if they are "real-life" or not?

0
Reply
Male 108
Why would you be stupid enough to move your 360 while it`s playing?

And then blame Microsoft for it?

0
Reply
Male 1,386
i dont have quicktime :-(. oh well. but, i think the wii is the best out of the 3. who cares about "amazing, real life graphics?" i dont. i want to have fun playing video games, not just sit and stare at the beauty of it, like it is some kind of painting. and besides, wii has legend of zelda!1!one!!1!!!1 :->:->:->:->:-> yay!
0
Reply
Male 274
Oh yeah and Enth....OPEN YOUR EYES! X-box 360 can suck Nintendo`s Wii and PS3 is BETTA!!
0
Reply
Male 274
The PS3 and the X-box 360 are clearly the winners here. The Wii is obviously a P.O.S. Its true X-box 360 did look better in some instances, but PS3 did have its moments too. And well the Wii just...didn`t have any at all. But im going to have to go with the PS3 on this one, mainly due to graphic, the controls, and because my fiends X-box 360 has broken 4 TIMES!!! I guess you can`t move the X-box while its on, or else it ruins the game and the system goes kaput. And this 360 was a 4th generation!!! Microsoft does have some catching up to do if they don`t want some angry Halo 3 players who`s game and system defects during play. DOG NAMIT I HATE LONG POSTS!!!
0
Reply
Male 217
Wii is definitely the most fun of all the three consoles in my opinion.
0
Reply
Male 148
PS3 Might of won if they had more equal time as the 360 to work on their games. Wii was never about graphics... I don`t remember people complaining too much about ps2 graphics and the Wii graphics are a little better then those. Besides Nintendo is gonna win this time around with xbox in 2nd place agian.. and ps3 at the bottom.
0
Reply
Male 1,343
as they say in latin america, Viva La Revolución!
0
Reply
Male 1,343
you are all wrong!

its 10% graphics, 60% gameplay, 20% audio, and 10% story.

a.k.a. the wii ftw.

its cheaper and more fun (hence the wii vs. ps3 a while back).

so, if you are going to buy a console this season, buy them in this order of priority.

wii
360
ps3

in that order.

0
Reply
Female 441
.Wii still suc.Not just because of the crappy graphics but they just suc in general the contollers look retarded.but wat eva just some stupib video games
0
Reply
Male 226
Wii looks PS2ish..I dont know about you guys but you don`t see me complaining about my PS2`s graphics for that price...wait..Wii is the same price as the PS2`s launch price..games are too! It`s like buying a PS2 with motion sensing. =O
Wii Sports ftw! =) *hugs Wii*

One thing they missed out on the video is who has a bigger smile on their face while playing it. lol

nicole, i used to work at FYE and we had a LOT of people returning their 360s. So 360 was probably off worse than the PS3 is at launch. The PS3s big deal was the amount. 360 would freeze a lot and just die on you.

0
Reply
Female 2,552
I think Xbox 360 is better and I have it, and Playstation 3 got bad reviews, but you have to remember that with Wii you can actully move around and stuff.
0
Reply
Male 448
360s the best
0
Reply
Male 91
The wii lost out there, the gameplay must be better on the wii but bad graphics will drive you mad, especially on a big HD tv. The PS3 and 360 looked pretty good, but the 360 had a much better contrast, i think they definatly could have changed the settings to make the ps look much better.
0
Reply
Male 105
wii all the way...

even if it is not as powerful as its competitors, it is still much more innovative.

0
Reply
Male 220
the wii geaphics are so mauch better but they made it look like crap
0
Reply
Male 506
I seriously doubt that those were on the same TV.
0
Reply
Male 332
However, the PSP didn`t have 100 million previous owners to snap it up, and in terms of fanboy-ism, This gives Sony a significant advantage over nintendo`s paltry 15 million. Therefore, in sales I believe the two are a toss up, but my vote for "the better system" (and my cash) goes to the Wii.
0
Reply
Male 332
I`m sure the Wii won`t dissapoint, and since we`re so fond of looking at precedents, lets examine the DS/PSP war. The PSP had beter graphics, great multimedia support, and cost more. The DS added about twice the graphs of the previous system, but a revolutionary way to play and broad market appeal. At the beginning, they were neck and neck, with most analysts leaning towards the PSP to win the war, but in the end my friends, CONTENT WON. Looking at the Wii and PS3, the parallels are obvious, and history will most likely repeat itself. No screenshots, no bitching, just fact. Remember though that the PSP is by no means considered a flop, it has a dedicated community and sells like hotcakes, but the DS beats it over 2-to-1.
0
Reply
Male 194
People, people, people. Lets not base it on grapics. Personally I would love a game if it looked pooty, but was hella fun to play. I mean, the PS3 and X-Box may have it hands down in graphics, but the Wii has was better game play.
0
Reply
Female 458
Nerd `R` Us let us out early this year.
0
Reply
Male 645
This is the biggest nerd fest ive ever seen...
0
Reply
Female 458
My poor Wii. It seems so sad and lonely. I love you anyway!
0
Reply
Male 130
Wii. You can talk about graphics all you want, but about an hour in to any game, you will have gotten used to the graphics, and will simply be playing the game.
0
Reply
Male 561
Im am very happy with my wii i have had a 360 a xbox and a playstation 1 and 2 as well as a n64 regular and super nintendo and yes the wii is prob the best
0
Reply
Male 561
Xbox 360 was the best y was this because the xbox uses ati graphics and playstation 3 uses nvidia if you want something to look nice buy an ati
0
Reply
Male 230
http://i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?lin... have a look at this link again
0
Reply
Male 76
I have to agree with everyone that the Wii does not have the graphics, but for me the graphics would not be as important because of the controller.

In the graphics department, the Xbox 360 wins. PS3 looked too light. The 360 looked more realistic.

For the price they are charging for the PS3, I would get a 360. They are pretty much the same graphics wise, but the 360 has moew games out (such as Gears of War).

Everyone wants a Wii, just to try out the Wiimote.

0
Reply
Male 230
Graphics dont make a good game! look at Zelda Ocarina of time a drating awsome game and look how pooy the graphics were.
0
Reply
Female 302
Oh and not to mention Sony say hat we DONT MIND to wait for games

Look like Sony think we are very patient.

anyway,
Then there is the "Wii" fun, good for EVERYONE (no longer for kids only) which have my grandma having same fum as my little cousin. And more "mature" game too (aka animated blood blablabla)less graphic but one day they understood people want to have fun. Graphic passed second.

I played the 3, and i stick with the Wii.
I was use to be a PS fangirl, but its over.

And yes, i do play PC games alot too, but I think console games have a little something more that i cant resist >.>;

*open the Wii and satisfy her craving for Twilight princess*

0
Reply
Female 302
I was knowing the comments will be entertaining. Working in gaming industry and having also alot of gamer friends (including mysefl somehow gamer) give me alot of nice point of views.

yeah, we are all fan-boy/girl to a extends. I got VERY deseapointed by the Xbox360, mostly got the lack of games and the unstability of the system. Returning you console does suck, but burning the rug and ruining games disk are even worst.

the PS3 was damn expensive, whit a shortage (which is a new idea totally ridiculous) whit a "copy cat" technology from the Revolution for the controler motion what ever. Not to mention sony drated the europeen gaming Closed the biggest and better service for europeen gaming

0
Reply
Male 3
To the genius who posted the links comparing screenshots from MGS and MGS3, MGS was released for the original PS (PS1 or however you want to abbreviate it), NOT the PS2. The screencap you linked to for the original MGS was taken from the PC version of the game. Try reading the descriptions of the pictures you link to next time. MGS2 and MGS3 were both released for the PS2 so if you want to make comparisons use SOL and SE, NOT the original MGS.
0
Reply
Male 239
Xbox rules
0
Reply
Male 223
"2 terraflops" is that how badly Sony will loose out??
still Wii Looked fun i hate graphics looking nice, i have a 360.. and ts 10X funner than my ps2 (which ive had 2 of crap lazers) and my Ps was good but broke wayy too much!
0
Reply
Female 172
wow.. the wii looked like crap. i liked the x-box the best, but it seemed a bit dark and hard to see b.c of it. but it may have just been the scenes they chose or my computer. who knows
0
Reply
Male 438
As mentioned the PS3 is hard to code for, the graphics difference could be accounted for by the Shader, and I think that the PS3 has slightly more "dull" graphics over the 360 because 1 lack of time they have had acess to it. (they only had development kits, and not actual units too), and 2, as mentioned above it`s hard to code for so making a good PS3 specific shader might have been harder.
0
Reply
Male 924
wii was not made for graphics it was designed for cheap intuitive gameplay which i believe it has done. i am getting one because it is a new idea, nintendo thought that if people were gonna buy a new console then they wouldnt have loads left for an hd tv, ps3 have made it exspensive and hd is needed xbox is kinda halfway
with ninty, you could have enough left for an hdtv
side note: shigeru miyamoto(creator of mario and nintendo god) wanted wii to cost £60!
and that would have been a good console, but now its so good for me there is no alternative
0
Reply
Male 2,605
For one, why is this link under the `Computers & Internet` category?

For two, everyone knows that the PC owns all consoles in terms of capability, gaming or otherwise. Is it really a coincidence that all consoles have taken to modelling themselves after the PC?

0
Reply
Female 48
The Wii is fun. I`ll stick with that.

I`d rather not pay insane amounts for a game system that cannot even play most of the games from previous systems. Backwards compatibility FTW.

Also: PS3 and Xbox360 only look that good on hi-def tvs. The average person`s tv will make games harder to play because of small text.

0
Reply
Female 408
I`m not getting one becuase I read rather than control-bash.
0
Reply
Male 724
The shades were different... setting the Wii aside

The difference between the PS3 and the Xbox 360 is that the Xbox 360 has good shading, giving more contrast to the colors. The PS3 seems to be very bright and doesnt have the same shading giving it less contrast.

0
Reply
Male 1,092
As you can see - Wii is poor, ps3 is better but xbox 360 is the greatest
0
Reply
Male 737
Well this is pointless, because where Sony and Microsoft want amazing graphics, Nintendo wants new gameplay.

Anyways, whatever anyone thinks, i`m with the N all the way.

0
Reply
Male 215
As a playstation fanboy through and through, it hurts a little to say that the xbox looks better. But, like some others have said, it is very early days, and things can only go up for the console.

This is about the first time I`ve ever been interested enough in more than one console. I think in the long run the 360 will end up offering the least of the 3 (no motion sensitivity, lack of blu-ray etc etc.), and it`s only doing so well because of its head start. The others look ace, though.

Damnit, I might have to do something as drastic as getting a job do feed my gaming habits.

0
Reply
Male 2,057
gametrailers.com does this a lot, and not always in annoying-take-forever HD
0
Reply
Male 88
360 did own that.

It wasent fair to have the wii there for comparison tho. Its a totally different sytem.

0
Reply
Male 601
By far the 360 looks the best, which is good, cuz that`s the one I own :P
0
Reply
Female 799
Im not getting any of them anyway so it doesnt bother me.
0
Reply
Male 1,265
Suicism, make some damn sense. My mind IS made up. And returning PS1 five times over the course of its shoddy run means I got crap during its ENTIRE run. And what irrefutable point? 360`s been out how long now? A year? That means they`ve reached the end of their development? And the example cited, the Metal Gear 1 & 3, came out how far apart and how near the beginning and end of PS2`s run? Also, Devil`s Advocate? Yeah, I totally buy that he went through all that trouble without the slightest bit of bias.
0
Reply
Male 227
Ya I was hoping for a actual System Review not just the viewing on a single game,
from what I saw I would have said that the 360 won.
However this was not a fair comparison for the Wii seeings as this was one of the lowest rated games that came out and the Wii wasn`t built for graphics,
If you play LoZ you can clearly see that the graphics arn`t as bad as this video made the seem.
0
Reply
Male 230
"Wii SUCS!!!!!!!!!!!!I am getting a PS3.even though for me it was a close between PS3 & Xbox360"

Exactly what I`d expect a female to say.

If you didn`t notice, Nintendo`s console is like 3 times cheaper than either the PS3 or 360, plus its aiming for gameplay, not graphics.

Do your research before you judge on one viewing alone.

0
Reply
Female 441
Wii SUCS!!!!!!!!!!!!I am getting a PS3.even though for me it was a close between PS3 & Xbox360
0
Reply
Male 203
xbox 360 all the way, the dynamic lighting and graphic texture `crispness` (so to speak) r league ahead :D Crowe
0
Reply
Male 85
I doubt very, very much that the Wii was on the same television- the alledged blockiness was very consistent with simply being too close to a small TV.
0
Reply
Male 3,631
Not me! I`m made in the image of our Heavenly Father, to his Divine specifications.

Anyway, I`m actually more eager to see how Nintendo harnesses this development scenario; it`s their `revolution,` afterall, that I am the most enthusiastic about joining...

0
Reply
Male 2,567
whose the monkey?
0
Reply
Male 3,631
Bad-monkey, bad!
0
Reply
Male 3,631
SpoonFork, make up your mind, and stop bashing awibble`s invulnerable analysis simply because you had a bad experience with the company who`s console he is merely acting as Devil`s Advocate for. My PS2 never broke down, neither did my friend`s, and neither did his PS1; that`s why you don`t buy things RIGHT WHEN THEY COME OUT, you wait a while for them to work out all the kinks and MAXIMIZE their potential, per the argument and examples put-forth by awibble.
0
Reply
Male 3,631
"...while neglecting that XBOX 360 will have the same time to do this, also."

Uh, 360`s been out for over a year, and PS3 just came out; and awibble has an undeniable point, especially considering the PS3 runs on 2 terraflops, whereas the 360 halted at 1.6. It`s what you do with the graphics that matters (I`ve seen N64 games that look better than even some of what Nintendo`s doing right now), and with more capacity the ball`s of course in Sony`s court to maximize that potential. That is why I am not buying either right now, but if I were to I`d probably get the 360 after seeing that review, simply for the interest of sheer instant-gratification. That`s really cool that you can motion-activate the PS3 controls to a certain degree, and in the very paramaters that so many of us have struggled to exploit since the days of our first Nintendo racing-game; can`t wait to see how Gran Turismo feels while taking those tight corners!

0
Reply
Female 1,496
Blah blah blah. Let`s assume they used the same TV same settings. The XBox looks the best. I was always a Playstation fan until I had to send my 3 month old PS2 in at my cost because of their crappy "misalined" lazer. Also add into effect the dozen or so game programmers out there that are flat out refusing to code games for the PS3 due to the fact it is not a user friendly format. Last but not least, you cheap bastards, why not just buy both. You`ll have to if you want to play Resistence Fall of Man or Final Fantasy.
0
Reply
Male 3,255
ps3
0
Reply
Female 95
I`m just gna buy them all :D
0
Reply
Male 68
I`m chilled, i have a 360, and im buying a PS3 when i can. Just getting fed up of people saying, look this is better, when overall they all have good things :D

Wasnt making excuses, but its a fact that graphics get better over time, which helps for the 360 at the moment.

0
Reply
Male 1,265
Damn, awibble, chill out. I like how you say that PS3 needs time to figure their poo out, while neglecting that XBOX 360 will have the same time to do this, also. XBOX 360 is better in these videos, with no excuses. I know which I`m getting, especially after having to buy the damn PS1 5 different times because the stupid thing kept breaking, and my PS2 is finally puttering out (my brother`s also crapped out, too). I`ve been burned too many times by Sony`s shoddy system. I take care of my stuff, so that`s really no excuse. Barring that, it`s just rotten luck. But, then again, I`ve never had a problem with my XBOX. Price and reliability (and now graphics), I`m sold.
0
Reply
Female 95
maybe they just turned the brightness down on the screen for 360 or up for ps3?
0
Reply
Male 68
price comparison. That shows how much you are getting with the PS3, dont forget that its also a blu-ray dvd player.... £900ish ($1800ish)on play.com, yet the PS3 is only £550 ($1100ish) thats already a £350 ($700ish) saving, before you even think about the fact its a games console.

I think in a year, a much better review will come out. Sony has paved the way for consolses ith the PS1 and PS2, and they are doing it again with the PS3. Lets face it, the Gamecube pretty much sucked, and untill the Xbox, most people would only buy a PS2, because it was the best.

If you have the money buy all 3, the X360 will give you the great graphics untill the PS3 catches up. The wii will give you the gameplay that you want. and the PS3 will give you a good mix of both, with the graphics improving all the time.

0
Reply
Male 68
Now lets look at the x360 and the PS3, the graphics on the x360 are far better in this preview, but equally, they have had longer to work with the graphics engine. This cna make a shuge differnce as seen on the PS2 with Metal Gear solid.

Its a pretty safe bet, that the PS3 will get better, sony haven`t let us down on quality before, an i firmly belive that the graphics when they have had the same development time, will match if not out rank the x360.

The other thing that people seem to be forgetting, is that the PS3`s controller is also motion sensitive, they just arent making a big thing out of it like Wii is, infact, ive only seen it mentioned a few times. A little way into the trailer you can see this, on the 360 you have to press LT and RT over and over, on the PS3 you have to move the controller left and right, and on the wii you do a similar move.

Which gives the best gameplay, well thats upto you, but i think the PS3 will be the best.

If you search around you can find a

0
Reply
Male 68
One thing that i think people have forgotton.

Boot up you PS2 and look at the graphics on the orginal metal gear solid. Now stick in Metal gear solid 3, the graphics are far far better. Why? because they had learnt more about how to use the graphics engine when metal gear 3 came out.

Heres a couple of screen shots...
Metal Gear Solid http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MGS_s...

Metal Gear Solid 3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MgsCa...

Notice how the textures are very flat in the first one, compared with the depth of snake eater (metal gear 3) Theres a huge difference.

Now going back to PS3 vs X360 vs Wii...

The Wii`s graphics are not that great, you can see that stright off, developers have had about the same amount of time on the wii and the PS3, so they should be at similar levels of development. Its pret

0
Reply
Male 185
25% to audio, come on. You forget story unless you lump that in with gameplay which is over simplifying it.
0
Reply
Male 128
Yeah, of course PS3 and Xbox have sheer graphical power, but you forget that graphics is merely 25% of what makes a game good, with 50% being on gameplay and Wii obviously owns that market. And of course the latter 25% belonging to the much underrated audio.
0
Reply
Female 401
x-box looked way better than the others...the ps3 was really light but i like to see what im doing and the graphics on the Wii...Poor Wii and I thought I would like that the best..oh well im not getting any of those so who cares but it was cool seeing that..
0
Reply
Male 3,631
Wow, this was REALLY, REALLY helpful. I really wanted to see something like this, and assuming all displays were generated from the same source, I definitely stand corrected; I am buying an X-box.
0
Reply
Male 3,631
My pre-viewing prediction is that the PS3 shall come out victorious.
0
Reply
Female 427
Nintendo focused more on enjoyment than graphics while ps3 and xbox did both. Keeping the graphics the way they did Nintendo could offer the system for cheaper.

I have played it on the xbox and wii. It`s more fun on the wii because of the controller, but the graphics on the xbox own

0
Reply
Male 2,513
Oh I loathe quicktime.
0
Reply
Male 108
It`s almost as if they forgot that they could use colours on the PS3.

I assume that it was intentional, but it really didn`t work out well.

Oh, and obligatory it`s not really fair to compare the Wii for its graphics comment.

0
Reply
Male 10,115
Link: XBOX 360 vs PS3 vs Wii [Rate Link] - Same game on all three.
0
Reply