Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 121    Average: 4/5]
132 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 44388
Rating: 4
Category: Tech
Date: 12/08/06 02:01 AM

132 Responses to XBOX 360 vs PS3 vs Wii

  1. Profile photo of buddy
    buddy Male 30-39
    10116 posts
    December 7, 2006 at 11:38 pm
    Link: XBOX 360 vs PS3 vs Wii - Same game on all three.
  2. Profile photo of b_bobbin
    b_bobbin Male 18-29
    108 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 1:25 am
    It`s almost as if they forgot that they could use colours on the PS3.

    I assume that it was intentional, but it really didn`t work out well.

    Oh, and obligatory it`s not really fair to compare the Wii for its graphics comment.

  3. Profile photo of xelous
    xelous Male 18-29
    2513 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:07 am
    Oh I loathe quicktime.
  4. Profile photo of chikoori
    chikoori Female 18-29
    1012 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:20 am
    I think the 360 owned them all.
  5. Profile photo of pinker
    pinker Female 18-29
    427 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:24 am
    Nintendo focused more on enjoyment than graphics while ps3 and xbox did both. Keeping the graphics the way they did Nintendo could offer the system for cheaper.

    I have played it on the xbox and wii. It`s more fun on the wii because of the controller, but the graphics on the xbox own

  6. Profile photo of Suicism
    Suicism Male 18-29
    3625 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:36 am
    My pre-viewing prediction is that the PS3 shall come out victorious.
  7. Profile photo of Suicism
    Suicism Male 18-29
    3625 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:43 am
    Wow, this was REALLY, REALLY helpful. I really wanted to see something like this, and assuming all displays were generated from the same source, I definitely stand corrected; I am buying an X-box.
  8. Profile photo of engruls06
    engruls06 Female 18-29
    401 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:59 am
    x-box looked way better than the others...the ps3 was really light but i like to see what im doing and the graphics on the Wii...Poor Wii and I thought I would like that the best..oh well im not getting any of those so who cares but it was cool seeing that..
  9. Profile photo of DarthKarnage
    DarthKarnage Male 18-29
    128 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 3:04 am
    Yeah, of course PS3 and Xbox have sheer graphical power, but you forget that graphics is merely 25% of what makes a game good, with 50% being on gameplay and Wii obviously owns that market. And of course the latter 25% belonging to the much underrated audio.
  10. Profile photo of ninja_mut
    ninja_mut Male 18-29
    185 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 3:07 am
    25% to audio, come on. You forget story unless you lump that in with gameplay which is over simplifying it.
  11. Profile photo of awibble
    awibble Male 18-29
    68 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:01 am
    One thing that i think people have forgotton.

    Boot up you PS2 and look at the graphics on the orginal metal gear solid. Now stick in Metal gear solid 3, the graphics are far far better. Why? because they had learnt more about how to use the graphics engine when metal gear 3 came out.

    Heres a couple of screen shots...
    Metal Gear Solid http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MGS_s...

    Metal Gear Solid 3
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:MgsCa...

    Notice how the textures are very flat in the first one, compared with the depth of snake eater (metal gear 3) Theres a huge difference.

    Now going back to PS3 vs X360 vs Wii...

    The Wii`s graphics are not that great, you can see that stright off, developers have had about the same amount of time on the wii and the PS3, so they should be at similar levels of development. Its pret

  12. Profile photo of awibble
    awibble Male 18-29
    68 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:06 am
    Now lets look at the x360 and the PS3, the graphics on the x360 are far better in this preview, but equally, they have had longer to work with the graphics engine. This cna make a shuge differnce as seen on the PS2 with Metal Gear solid.

    Its a pretty safe bet, that the PS3 will get better, sony haven`t let us down on quality before, an i firmly belive that the graphics when they have had the same development time, will match if not out rank the x360.

    The other thing that people seem to be forgetting, is that the PS3`s controller is also motion sensitive, they just arent making a big thing out of it like Wii is, infact, ive only seen it mentioned a few times. A little way into the trailer you can see this, on the 360 you have to press LT and RT over and over, on the PS3 you have to move the controller left and right, and on the wii you do a similar move.

    Which gives the best gameplay, well thats upto you, but i think the PS3 will be the best.

    If you search around you can find a

  13. Profile photo of awibble
    awibble Male 18-29
    68 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:10 am
    price comparison. That shows how much you are getting with the PS3, dont forget that its also a blu-ray dvd player.... £900ish ($1800ish)on play.com, yet the PS3 is only £550 ($1100ish) thats already a £350 ($700ish) saving, before you even think about the fact its a games console.

    I think in a year, a much better review will come out. Sony has paved the way for consolses ith the PS1 and PS2, and they are doing it again with the PS3. Lets face it, the Gamecube pretty much sucked, and untill the Xbox, most people would only buy a PS2, because it was the best.

    If you have the money buy all 3, the X360 will give you the great graphics untill the PS3 catches up. The wii will give you the gameplay that you want. and the PS3 will give you a good mix of both, with the graphics improving all the time.

  14. Profile photo of donxkey
    donxkey Female 18-29
    95 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:12 am
    maybe they just turned the brightness down on the screen for 360 or up for ps3?
  15. Profile photo of SpoonFork
    SpoonFork Male 30-39
    1265 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:34 am
    Damn, awibble, chill out. I like how you say that PS3 needs time to figure their poo out, while neglecting that XBOX 360 will have the same time to do this, also. XBOX 360 is better in these videos, with no excuses. I know which I`m getting, especially after having to buy the damn PS1 5 different times because the stupid thing kept breaking, and my PS2 is finally puttering out (my brother`s also crapped out, too). I`ve been burned too many times by Sony`s shoddy system. I take care of my stuff, so that`s really no excuse. Barring that, it`s just rotten luck. But, then again, I`ve never had a problem with my XBOX. Price and reliability (and now graphics), I`m sold.
  16. Profile photo of awibble
    awibble Male 18-29
    68 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:37 am
    I`m chilled, i have a 360, and im buying a PS3 when i can. Just getting fed up of people saying, look this is better, when overall they all have good things :D

    Wasnt making excuses, but its a fact that graphics get better over time, which helps for the 360 at the moment.

  17. Profile photo of donxkey
    donxkey Female 18-29
    95 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:55 am
    I`m just gna buy them all :D
  18. Profile photo of Zerocyde
    Zerocyde Male 18-29
    3258 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:07 am
    ps3
  19. Profile photo of Devi3000
    Devi3000 Female 18-29
    1497 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:53 am
    Blah blah blah. Let`s assume they used the same TV same settings. The XBox looks the best. I was always a Playstation fan until I had to send my 3 month old PS2 in at my cost because of their crappy "misalined" lazer. Also add into effect the dozen or so game programmers out there that are flat out refusing to code games for the PS3 due to the fact it is not a user friendly format. Last but not least, you cheap bastards, why not just buy both. You`ll have to if you want to play Resistence Fall of Man or Final Fantasy.
  20. Profile photo of Suicism
    Suicism Male 18-29
    3625 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:30 am
    "...while neglecting that XBOX 360 will have the same time to do this, also."

    Uh, 360`s been out for over a year, and PS3 just came out; and awibble has an undeniable point, especially considering the PS3 runs on 2 terraflops, whereas the 360 halted at 1.6. It`s what you do with the graphics that matters (I`ve seen N64 games that look better than even some of what Nintendo`s doing right now), and with more capacity the ball`s of course in Sony`s court to maximize that potential. That is why I am not buying either right now, but if I were to I`d probably get the 360 after seeing that review, simply for the interest of sheer instant-gratification. That`s really cool that you can motion-activate the PS3 controls to a certain degree, and in the very paramaters that so many of us have struggled to exploit since the days of our first Nintendo racing-game; can`t wait to see how Gran Turismo feels while taking those tight corners!

  21. Profile photo of Suicism
    Suicism Male 18-29
    3625 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:35 am
    SpoonFork, make up your mind, and stop bashing awibble`s invulnerable analysis simply because you had a bad experience with the company who`s console he is merely acting as Devil`s Advocate for. My PS2 never broke down, neither did my friend`s, and neither did his PS1; that`s why you don`t buy things RIGHT WHEN THEY COME OUT, you wait a while for them to work out all the kinks and MAXIMIZE their potential, per the argument and examples put-forth by awibble.
  22. Profile photo of Suicism
    Suicism Male 18-29
    3625 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:36 am
    Bad-monkey, bad!
  23. Profile photo of notapervert
    notapervert Male 13-17
    2568 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:41 am
    whose the monkey?
  24. Profile photo of Suicism
    Suicism Male 18-29
    3625 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:51 am
    Not me! I`m made in the image of our Heavenly Father, to his Divine specifications.

    Anyway, I`m actually more eager to see how Nintendo harnesses this development scenario; it`s their `revolution,` afterall, that I am the most enthusiastic about joining...

  25. Profile photo of freeze43
    freeze43 Male 18-29
    85 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:00 am
    I doubt very, very much that the Wii was on the same television- the alledged blockiness was very consistent with simply being too close to a small TV.
  26. Profile photo of Crowe
    Crowe Male 18-29
    204 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:10 am
    xbox 360 all the way, the dynamic lighting and graphic texture `crispness` (so to speak) r league ahead :D Crowe
  27. Profile photo of BabiiGirl93
    BabiiGirl93 Female 13-17
    441 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:24 am
    Wii SUCS!!!!!!!!!!!!I am getting a PS3.even though for me it was a close between PS3 & Xbox360
  28. Profile photo of 0verclock3d
    0verclock3d Male 13-17
    230 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:47 am
    "Wii SUCS!!!!!!!!!!!!I am getting a PS3.even though for me it was a close between PS3 & Xbox360"

    Exactly what I`d expect a female to say.

    If you didn`t notice, Nintendo`s console is like 3 times cheaper than either the PS3 or 360, plus its aiming for gameplay, not graphics.

    Do your research before you judge on one viewing alone.

  29. Profile photo of fire_frog
    fire_frog Male 18-29
    228 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 9:09 am
    Ya I was hoping for a actual System Review not just the viewing on a single game,
    from what I saw I would have said that the 360 won.
    However this was not a fair comparison for the Wii seeings as this was one of the lowest rated games that came out and the Wii wasn`t built for graphics,
    If you play LoZ you can clearly see that the graphics arn`t as bad as this video made the seem.
  30. Profile photo of SpoonFork
    SpoonFork Male 30-39
    1265 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 10:04 am
    Suicism, make some damn sense. My mind IS made up. And returning PS1 five times over the course of its shoddy run means I got crap during its ENTIRE run. And what irrefutable point? 360`s been out how long now? A year? That means they`ve reached the end of their development? And the example cited, the Metal Gear 1 & 3, came out how far apart and how near the beginning and end of PS2`s run? Also, Devil`s Advocate? Yeah, I totally buy that he went through all that trouble without the slightest bit of bias.
  31. Profile photo of monert
    monert Female 18-29
    799 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 10:14 am
    Im not getting any of them anyway so it doesnt bother me.
  32. Profile photo of kylethehappy
    kylethehappy Male 13-17
    601 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 10:31 am
    By far the 360 looks the best, which is good, cuz that`s the one I own :P
  33. Profile photo of -Jaz-
    -Jaz- Male 18-29
    88 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 10:41 am
    360 did own that.

    It wasent fair to have the wii there for comparison tho. Its a totally different sytem.

  34. Profile photo of ryan14
    ryan14 Male 13-17
    2057 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 10:47 am
    gametrailers.com does this a lot, and not always in annoying-take-forever HD
  35. Profile photo of thespread
    thespread Male 13-17
    215 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 10:50 am
    As a playstation fanboy through and through, it hurts a little to say that the xbox looks better. But, like some others have said, it is very early days, and things can only go up for the console.

    This is about the first time I`ve ever been interested enough in more than one console. I think in the long run the 360 will end up offering the least of the 3 (no motion sensitivity, lack of blu-ray etc etc.), and it`s only doing so well because of its head start. The others look ace, though.

    Damnit, I might have to do something as drastic as getting a job do feed my gaming habits.

  36. Profile photo of Custom_hobo
    Custom_hobo Male 13-17
    737 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 10:59 am
    Well this is pointless, because where Sony and Microsoft want amazing graphics, Nintendo wants new gameplay.

    Anyways, whatever anyone thinks, i`m with the N all the way.

  37. Profile photo of Bennyd
    Bennyd Male 13-17
    1092 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 11:38 am
    As you can see - Wii is poor, ps3 is better but xbox 360 is the greatest
  38. Profile photo of Invalok
    Invalok Male 18-29
    724 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 12:23 pm
    The shades were different... setting the Wii aside

    The difference between the PS3 and the Xbox 360 is that the Xbox 360 has good shading, giving more contrast to the colors. The PS3 seems to be very bright and doesnt have the same shading giving it less contrast.

  39. Profile photo of Cynnick
    Cynnick Female 13-17
    408 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 12:41 pm
    I`m not getting one becuase I read rather than control-bash.
  40. Profile photo of lostincoma
    lostincoma Female 18-29
    48 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 12:58 pm
    The Wii is fun. I`ll stick with that.

    I`d rather not pay insane amounts for a game system that cannot even play most of the games from previous systems. Backwards compatibility FTW.

    Also: PS3 and Xbox360 only look that good on hi-def tvs. The average person`s tv will make games harder to play because of small text.

  41. Profile photo of Overmann
    Overmann Male 18-29
    2600 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 1:18 pm
    For one, why is this link under the `Computers & Internet` category?

    For two, everyone knows that the PC owns all consoles in terms of capability, gaming or otherwise. Is it really a coincidence that all consoles have taken to modelling themselves after the PC?

  42. Profile photo of moojuiceman
    moojuiceman Male 18-29
    924 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 1:19 pm
    wii was not made for graphics it was designed for cheap intuitive gameplay which i believe it has done. i am getting one because it is a new idea, nintendo thought that if people were gonna buy a new console then they wouldnt have loads left for an hd tv, ps3 have made it exspensive and hd is needed xbox is kinda halfway
    with ninty, you could have enough left for an hdtv
    side note: shigeru miyamoto(creator of mario and nintendo god) wanted wii to cost £60!
    and that would have been a good console, but now its so good for me there is no alternative
  43. Profile photo of Legion5
    Legion5 Male 18-29
    439 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 1:33 pm
    As mentioned the PS3 is hard to code for, the graphics difference could be accounted for by the Shader, and I think that the PS3 has slightly more "dull" graphics over the 360 because 1 lack of time they have had acess to it. (they only had development kits, and not actual units too), and 2, as mentioned above it`s hard to code for so making a good PS3 specific shader might have been harder.
  44. Profile photo of IrishRose12
    IrishRose12 Female 18-29
    172 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 1:55 pm
    wow.. the wii looked like crap. i liked the x-box the best, but it seemed a bit dark and hard to see b.c of it. but it may have just been the scenes they chose or my computer. who knows
  45. Profile photo of BurnBurn
    BurnBurn Male 18-29
    223 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:00 pm
    "2 terraflops" is that how badly Sony will loose out??
    still Wii Looked fun i hate graphics looking nice, i have a 360.. and ts 10X funner than my ps2 (which ive had 2 of crap lazers) and my Ps was good but broke wayy too much!
  46. Profile photo of diegotx
    diegotx Male 18-29
    239 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:09 pm
    Xbox rules
  47. Profile photo of MaDttSkillz
    MaDttSkillz Male 18-29
    3 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:36 pm
    To the genius who posted the links comparing screenshots from MGS and MGS3, MGS was released for the original PS (PS1 or however you want to abbreviate it), NOT the PS2. The screencap you linked to for the original MGS was taken from the PC version of the game. Try reading the descriptions of the pictures you link to next time. MGS2 and MGS3 were both released for the PS2 so if you want to make comparisons use SOL and SE, NOT the original MGS.
  48. Profile photo of Guest5386
    Guest5386 Female 18-29
    302 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:38 pm
    I was knowing the comments will be entertaining. Working in gaming industry and having also alot of gamer friends (including mysefl somehow gamer) give me alot of nice point of views.

    yeah, we are all fan-boy/girl to a extends. I got VERY deseapointed by the Xbox360, mostly got the lack of games and the unstability of the system. Returning you console does suck, but burning the rug and ruining games disk are even worst.

    the PS3 was damn expensive, whit a shortage (which is a new idea totally ridiculous) whit a "copy cat" technology from the Revolution for the controler motion what ever. Not to mention sony drated the europeen gaming Closed the biggest and better service for europeen gaming

  49. Profile photo of Guest5386
    Guest5386 Female 18-29
    302 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 2:43 pm
    Oh and not to mention Sony say hat we DONT MIND to wait for games

    Look like Sony think we are very patient.

    anyway,
    Then there is the "Wii" fun, good for EVERYONE (no longer for kids only) which have my grandma having same fum as my little cousin. And more "mature" game too (aka animated blood blablabla)less graphic but one day they understood people want to have fun. Graphic passed second.

    I played the 3, and i stick with the Wii.
    I was use to be a PS fangirl, but its over.

    And yes, i do play PC games alot too, but I think console games have a little something more that i cant resist >.>;

    *open the Wii and satisfy her craving for Twilight princess*

  50. Profile photo of radar2434
    radar2434 Male 13-17
    230 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:02 pm
    Graphics dont make a good game! look at Zelda Ocarina of time a drating awsome game and look how pooy the graphics were.
  51. Profile photo of Beefynick
    Beefynick Male 18-29
    76 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:02 pm
    I have to agree with everyone that the Wii does not have the graphics, but for me the graphics would not be as important because of the controller.

    In the graphics department, the Xbox 360 wins. PS3 looked too light. The 360 looked more realistic.

    For the price they are charging for the PS3, I would get a 360. They are pretty much the same graphics wise, but the 360 has moew games out (such as Gears of War).

    Everyone wants a Wii, just to try out the Wiimote.

  52. Profile photo of radar2434
    radar2434 Male 13-17
    230 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:03 pm
    http://i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?lin... have a look at this link again
  53. Profile photo of STARTSOMETIN
    STARTSOMETIN Male 18-29
    561 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:28 pm
    Xbox 360 was the best y was this because the xbox uses ati graphics and playstation 3 uses nvidia if you want something to look nice buy an ati
  54. Profile photo of STARTSOMETIN
    STARTSOMETIN Male 18-29
    561 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:30 pm
    Im am very happy with my wii i have had a 360 a xbox and a playstation 1 and 2 as well as a n64 regular and super nintendo and yes the wii is prob the best
  55. Profile photo of narlycharlie
    narlycharlie Male 13-17
    130 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:33 pm
    Wii. You can talk about graphics all you want, but about an hour in to any game, you will have gotten used to the graphics, and will simply be playing the game.
  56. Profile photo of Will-O-Wisp
    Will-O-Wisp Female 18-29
    458 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:44 pm
    My poor Wii. It seems so sad and lonely. I love you anyway!
  57. Profile photo of p-ball4life
    p-ball4life Male 18-29
    645 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:45 pm
    This is the biggest nerd fest ive ever seen...
  58. Profile photo of Will-O-Wisp
    Will-O-Wisp Female 18-29
    458 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:47 pm
    Nerd `R` Us let us out early this year.
  59. Profile photo of skit_z
    skit_z Male 13-17
    194 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:51 pm
    People, people, people. Lets not base it on grapics. Personally I would love a game if it looked pooty, but was hella fun to play. I mean, the PS3 and X-Box may have it hands down in graphics, but the Wii has was better game play.
  60. Profile photo of joeyhndc
    joeyhndc Male 18-29
    332 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 4:53 pm
    I`m sure the Wii won`t dissapoint, and since we`re so fond of looking at precedents, lets examine the DS/PSP war. The PSP had beter graphics, great multimedia support, and cost more. The DS added about twice the graphs of the previous system, but a revolutionary way to play and broad market appeal. At the beginning, they were neck and neck, with most analysts leaning towards the PSP to win the war, but in the end my friends, CONTENT WON. Looking at the Wii and PS3, the parallels are obvious, and history will most likely repeat itself. No screenshots, no bitching, just fact. Remember though that the PSP is by no means considered a flop, it has a dedicated community and sells like hotcakes, but the DS beats it over 2-to-1.
  61. Profile photo of joeyhndc
    joeyhndc Male 18-29
    332 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:05 pm
    However, the PSP didn`t have 100 million previous owners to snap it up, and in terms of fanboy-ism, This gives Sony a significant advantage over nintendo`s paltry 15 million. Therefore, in sales I believe the two are a toss up, but my vote for "the better system" (and my cash) goes to the Wii.
  62. Profile photo of Omgroflwtf
    Omgroflwtf Male 13-17
    510 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:18 pm
    I seriously doubt that those were on the same TV.
  63. Profile photo of kid-avenger
    kid-avenger Male 13-17
    220 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:24 pm
    the wii geaphics are so mauch better but they made it look like crap
  64. Profile photo of ostracod
    ostracod Male 13-17
    105 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:28 pm
    wii all the way...

    even if it is not as powerful as its competitors, it is still much more innovative.

  65. Profile photo of billbob-05
    billbob-05 Male 18-29
    91 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:33 pm
    The wii lost out there, the gameplay must be better on the wii but bad graphics will drive you mad, especially on a big HD tv. The PS3 and 360 looked pretty good, but the 360 had a much better contrast, i think they definatly could have changed the settings to make the ps look much better.
  66. Profile photo of M3ntal1313
    M3ntal1313 Male 18-29
    449 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:37 pm
    360s the best
  67. Profile photo of nicole_xo
    nicole_xo Female 13-17
    2552 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:50 pm
    I think Xbox 360 is better and I have it, and Playstation 3 got bad reviews, but you have to remember that with Wii you can actully move around and stuff.
  68. Profile photo of punk1n
    punk1n Male 18-29
    226 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 5:56 pm
    Wii looks PS2ish..I dont know about you guys but you don`t see me complaining about my PS2`s graphics for that price...wait..Wii is the same price as the PS2`s launch price..games are too! It`s like buying a PS2 with motion sensing. =O
    Wii Sports ftw! =) *hugs Wii*

    One thing they missed out on the video is who has a bigger smile on their face while playing it. lol

    nicole, i used to work at FYE and we had a LOT of people returning their 360s. So 360 was probably off worse than the PS3 is at launch. The PS3s big deal was the amount. 360 would freeze a lot and just die on you.

  69. Profile photo of BabiiGirl93
    BabiiGirl93 Female 13-17
    441 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 6:00 pm
    .Wii still suc.Not just because of the crappy graphics but they just suc in general the contollers look retarded.but wat eva just some stupib video games
  70. Profile photo of IAmTheMoose
    IAmTheMoose Male 18-29
    1343 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 6:11 pm
    you are all wrong!

    its 10% graphics, 60% gameplay, 20% audio, and 10% story.

    a.k.a. the wii ftw.

    its cheaper and more fun (hence the wii vs. ps3 a while back).

    so, if you are going to buy a console this season, buy them in this order of priority.

    wii
    360
    ps3

    in that order.

  71. Profile photo of IAmTheMoose
    IAmTheMoose Male 18-29
    1343 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 6:12 pm
    as they say in latin america, Viva La Revolución!
  72. Profile photo of thesupreme1
    thesupreme1 Male 13-17
    148 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 6:17 pm
    PS3 Might of won if they had more equal time as the 360 to work on their games. Wii was never about graphics... I don`t remember people complaining too much about ps2 graphics and the Wii graphics are a little better then those. Besides Nintendo is gonna win this time around with xbox in 2nd place agian.. and ps3 at the bottom.
  73. Profile photo of deciduous
    deciduous Male 13-17
    217 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 6:32 pm
    Wii is definitely the most fun of all the three consoles in my opinion.
  74. Profile photo of 23scadu
    23scadu Male 18-29
    274 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 6:53 pm
    The PS3 and the X-box 360 are clearly the winners here. The Wii is obviously a P.O.S. Its true X-box 360 did look better in some instances, but PS3 did have its moments too. And well the Wii just...didn`t have any at all. But im going to have to go with the PS3 on this one, mainly due to graphic, the controls, and because my fiends X-box 360 has broken 4 TIMES!!! I guess you can`t move the X-box while its on, or else it ruins the game and the system goes kaput. And this 360 was a 4th generation!!! Microsoft does have some catching up to do if they don`t want some angry Halo 3 players who`s game and system defects during play. DOG NAMIT I HATE LONG POSTS!!!
  75. Profile photo of 23scadu
    23scadu Male 18-29
    274 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 6:55 pm
    Oh yeah and Enth....OPEN YOUR EYES! X-box 360 can suck Nintendo`s Wii and PS3 is BETTA!!
  76. Profile photo of shinu
    shinu Male 18-29
    1387 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:12 pm
    i dont have quicktime :-(. oh well. but, i think the wii is the best out of the 3. who cares about "amazing, real life graphics?" i dont. i want to have fun playing video games, not just sit and stare at the beauty of it, like it is some kind of painting. and besides, wii has legend of zelda!1!one!!1!!!1 :->:->:->:->:-> yay!
  77. Profile photo of b_bobbin
    b_bobbin Male 18-29
    108 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:14 pm
    Why would you be stupid enough to move your 360 while it`s playing?

    And then blame Microsoft for it?

  78. Profile photo of lacker239
    lacker239 Male 13-17
    319 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:17 pm
    i hate how people can/will buy consoles based simply on graphics

    games are to play, not to stare at, who cares if they are "real-life" or not?

  79. Profile photo of kobo1d
    kobo1d Male 18-29
    30 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:53 pm
    Sponsored by Microsoft?

    Seriously, this comparison heavily favors the 360.

    The Wii can`t compete in pure graphical grunt at it`s price point, and is admittedly going for a totally different experience/audience.

    The PS3 has more raw power than the 360. However, devs are still learning how to optimize their games for the system. It does have a distinct disadvantage in comparison to the year-old 360.

    The difference should be mitigated in about 6-8 months, in which you will see the PS3 surpass the 360 in pure shininess.

    Of course, A high-end PC is roughly equivilent to a 360/PS3 right now and in a year or so will put them both to shame.

    So for me, the Wii is the only attractive option because I don`t need another PC-like machine. Most people don`t have the luxury of nice computers though, so the cheaper 360s/PS3s might be good in those situations.

  80. Profile photo of RedVoodoo
    RedVoodoo Male 18-29
    18 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:57 pm
    So what im hearing is darker graphics=better graphics? Eh, im sticking with PS3, regardeless if being one year behind in the fight it doesnt look quite as nice as Xbox. Sony has all the best licenses, and thats all that really matters, graphics are purely secondary.
  81. Profile photo of RyanF701
    RyanF701 Male 18-29
    2486 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 7:59 pm
    Wii is defiantly made for gameplay and fun, if I want graphics I have a computer.

    360 definatly kicked everyones ass graphic wise, and it doesn`t cost 600$ and then 100$ a game, for `blu-ray` which almost no TVs can see anyway.

    Whoever bought a PS3, grats on being scammed, if you think a Wii sucks, you dont deserve to have a console in the first place, graphics dont mean it`s a great game, i`d rather have fun doing something than staring at a screen that was pretty and I got bored of.

  82. Profile photo of SolidTurtle
    SolidTurtle Male 13-17
    161 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:00 pm
    For the record, the PS3 barely beats out the Xbox 360, both excell in different categories and it`s safe to say they`re about even. The wii focuses more on Fun and not graphics. And how can people say that now the Wii is for everyone when before Nintendo was for kids, Nintendo has always been for everyone, hence the lake of M rated games, they know how to make fun games that everyone can enjoy, most of the time their games are better than the M rated games on the PS2 and Xbox 360 but fanboys are so blind and stupid that to them the fact that it`s rated M just happens to make it better. Also, look at the DS vs the PSP, it`s like the Wii vs PS3, DS had crappier graphics, less features, yet it constantly outsells the PSP everywhere, in some countries it outsells it 4:1 because it appeals to everyone, I think in the end it will work out like that with the Wii vs PS3, I` m not mentioned Xbox 360 in this war because Wii and Xbox 360 are at a truce.
  83. Profile photo of RyanF701
    RyanF701 Male 18-29
    2486 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:05 pm
    " The Wii is obviously a P.O.S."

    You sir, are an idiot.

    Your telling me you`d rather stare at a TV that looked pretty, and then be bored with it in 10 seconds and get tired of boring gameplay, rather than stare at a decent looking TV and be entertained for hours at a time?

    Have fun..

  84. Profile photo of RyanF701
    RyanF701 Male 18-29
    2486 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:07 pm
    Also, blood, gore and sex does not mean the game makes you mature by playing it, or games without it do not mean your a little kid.
  85. Profile photo of Rakuru
    Rakuru Male 13-17
    59 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:51 pm
    Yeah I love the X360 graphics.. I was afraid that the PS3 might actually look better than X360, but firsthand all that hype seems to be nothing.. X360 looked better than PS3 a lot in this game. Now, Wii.. that`s kinda laughable. Graphics aren`t everything, but in a game like Call of Duty 3 I imagine a ton of the fun is feeling so immersed. I love my X360. =)
  86. Profile photo of slurba
    slurba Male 13-17
    132 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:52 pm
    Gaming system... expensive multimedia device.... gaming system... expensive multimedia device.

    Yup I`m getting the game system.

  87. Profile photo of trippyhippy9
    trippyhippy9 Male 18-29
    559 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:53 pm
    You people like to over analyze. This sucks, that`s better... They are all going to be fun to play.

    With Twilight Princess, Wii has the best new game of the Decade. Nintendo has once again reinvented the way you play video games.

    With it`s insane processing power, PS3 will look better than eihter of the others. Suck it up X-Box fan Boys, it has 8 processers and the hardware is superior, it looks better and there is nothing you can do or say to change that. Also, someone said PS didn`t have a problem with broken units when PS2 was released. That is only in your world, on earth, everyone has a problem with PS2 eventually, and my first PS was broken when I took it out of the box.

    X-Box has the best online play and audio options at this point. They also have some extremely cool games that won`t be on the other 2 systems like Fight Night and Halo. Don`t know about Marvel ultimate alliance on other systems, but that game is great on 360.

    I`m own a wii, and I may buy an 360.

  88. Profile photo of Rakuru
    Rakuru Male 13-17
    59 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 8:56 pm
    And yeah, I kinda dislike Sony a lot now. DRM rootkit stuff, laptop battery recall, and they sued website that sold Japanese PSPs to European people. Not very consumer friendly. :( XBox Live is cool from what I`ve seen in Perfect Dark Zero.. I think Nintendo is a bit crazy too but one game I would love to try is Twilight Princess (used to play Zelda a ton), besides that not much.
  89. Profile photo of Fabbyfubz
    Fabbyfubz Male 13-17
    176 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 9:01 pm
    I only want Ps3 for MGS4
  90. Profile photo of Yumiii
    Yumiii Female 13-17
    1382 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 9:31 pm
    *Spits on Wii haters*
    HAAAAAAAA...! *big breath*

    ...

    WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII! Can`t beat a Wii. Total Sega/Nintendo fan. (Yay Sonic 2006!)

  91. Profile photo of jhonmayer1
    jhonmayer1 Male 18-29
    1289 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 9:36 pm
    awww...the poor wii....lol....just doesnt stand up to anything...its like...a little higher than gamecube graphics....lol....and i dont think the color was right for the ps3....xbox looked good though...but its all about the ps3! WOOOOO!!!!
  92. Profile photo of Rammstein221
    Rammstein221 Male 13-17
    407 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 9:47 pm
    I`m just not impressed with the Ps3 at all. Sure it came out later, but that just means developers had a whole extra year to work on thier games, and it looks like they just dicked around for 12 months. With the Ps3`s alleged raw power it should be literally raping the 360 but it`s not, and it won`t be. Ps3 fanboys love to point out that it`ll look better as time goes on. Some holds true for X-box and Wii, and I bet out of the three the Wii progresses the most quickly because it`s got much simpler hardware and sofware to work with. Either way, if I`m buying a system for 600 bucks I want it to be superior now, not in 5 years. Plus that`s one big mother drater, I would literally not have room to put it anywhere. If anything I would get a 360 and a Wii and still save some bills over that Ps3, cause if I wanted to get one now It`d be like finding Mary Magdalene`s used tampon unless I wanted to pay about 9 large. Whatever, come wake me up when the Ps3 is living up to it`s hype.
  93. Profile photo of iceco
    iceco Male 18-29
    105 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 10:24 pm
    Whatever it is you want, have fun with it. period.
  94. Profile photo of Lazorfish
    Lazorfish Male 13-17
    738 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 10:53 pm
    For $250 bucks, Wii is at an advantage. I`m not willing to sell myself into prostitution for the 600 smackers for a PS3.

    If I wanted to look at pretty pictures, I would go to an art gallery. Not a PS3 or Xbox360. I don`t care about graphics as long as I can tell what the thing on the screen is. Fun trumps all other categories, at which the Wii excels.

  95. Profile photo of GrereX1
    GrereX1 Male 13-17
    921 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 11:03 pm
    Well while Suicism is taling about terraflops, let me point that the PS3 has Only 256 ram and The 360 has 512 ram.
  96. Profile photo of Rakuru
    Rakuru Male 13-17
    59 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 11:10 pm
    Wii is pretty cheap though, yeah.. I think it would be something to consider getting later possibly used.. prices always go way down before you know it, seemingly.. Only thing is I don`t see anything I would play on it besides Twilight Princess.. $300 is a lot to spend to play a game, but I`ll wait and see. =(

    And as those who say it`s not about the graphics, I love old games, of course, but there`s just something awesome and immersive about playing Half-Life 2 on a good computer or seeing the incredible detail possible in games like Dead Rising. (You can spend 10 minutes looking around at the shelves of some of the stores in that game if you get the chance, and all the stores in the mall are different.) But gameplay is most important factor and just like there`s different game genres, I can very much enjoy a simple game and turn around and be wowed by amazing graphics later. Who says art and games can`t be combined? =)

  97. Profile photo of fire_frog
    fire_frog Male 18-29
    228 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 11:44 pm
    The only and ONLY way the PS3 would possible become appealing is if they dropped $300 off.
    Also I just set up my Wii on my widescreen and it looks abosofrickinglutly amazing,
    I highly doubt that they played the Wii on a good TV.
  98. Profile photo of freeze43
    freeze43 Male 18-29
    85 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 11:49 pm
    Let me again reinterate, in case if anyone missed...
    no way are these 3 on the same television, the wii has some small tv close to them *and* if anyone cares to look, it seems that when the 3 are being compared with each other for same time etc. i dare say that sometimes one is blurry when compared to others- probably due to speeding up or slowing down to make the whole thing seem more timed with the other cinema sequences. Furthermore this one game says very little regarding whatever it is these machines can do- it`s a very early 3rd party developer and owing to the 360 being created first it naturally has a lot more time allocated to fine tuning it. Give it 6 months and some new games and then we`ll be able to work out who`s graphics (if anything) are better.
  99. Profile photo of DMDekoth
    DMDekoth Male 70 & Over
    888 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 11:51 pm
    Its probably true that they had less time to work with the converting it to the PS3 and Wii to optimize them and everything, but its clear the Wii has limitations.
    While the Wii is understandable, it hurts the PS3`s credibility - you`ve already paid over $600 for worse graphics than an easier-to-get 360 with all the bells and whistles (and games), or a Wii with the unique controllers at a fraction of the cost.

    Though the PS3 would have probably reigned supreme if they had more time to work with it and pushed everything to its limits.

    I also noticed that the Wii had a bad picture, it didn`t seem like intentional graphics but a refresh rate issue or something. I saw screen tearing and blockiness.

  100. Profile photo of SolidTurtle
    SolidTurtle Male 13-17
    161 posts
    December 8, 2006 at 11:53 pm
    Like I said before, the PS3 is barely more powerful than the Xbox360, that`s a fact, not to mention that it`s harder to develop for and what it can do on paper, is different than what developers will actually achieve. When it`s so hard to develop for, the better stats mean hardly anything.
  101. Profile photo of nevered
    nevered Male 18-29
    42 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 12:13 am
    sure, the PS3 looks better.

    but not $600 worth of `better`

  102. Profile photo of Rammstein221
    Rammstein221 Male 13-17
    407 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 12:37 am
    The Blu-ray drive might have really drated them over. It`s still basically a proprietary format that may or may not even take off sucessfully. It may be another Beta-max on Sony`s resume. The problem with that is that the Bu-ray drive seems to be the most expensive part of the machine, if they opted not to use it, you could probably very easily find the Ps3 being at a competive price to the 360.
  103. Profile photo of NOFX14
    NOFX14 Male 18-29
    1141 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 12:59 am
    this is stupid. you cant really compare Wii to the others with only graphics, although out of all of them XBOX360 did have the best. sadly simply judging by flashy graphics is not a good way to make a judgement on what next-gen system you should buy.
  104. Profile photo of Rakuru
    Rakuru Male 13-17
    59 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 1:29 am
    Agree with the Blu-ray thing, at first I thought it would be nice but I wonder how many people are actually going to buy Blu-Ray movies even with it available.. is it really worth that much more cost? Xbox 360 will be a little more competitive with them with their new attachable HD-DVD drive and downloadable HD content but to be honest I`m not so sure if the cost of all this high def stuff makes it that much better than the normal 480p that most video DVDs are in. I mean, on my screen, 480p DVDs look great anyway..

    As for PS3 and Xbox 360, I think that the hardware is so different it`s hard to compare (apples to oranges) but I`d guess from what I`ve seen it looks about equal. And it seems most people think Xbox 360 graphics in games are better ATM.. PS3 will likely catch up in some time, but I doubt that it`ll have noticable performance differences. And unless you really like Blu-Ray it might not be worth the money. =( I`d rather have Xbox Live than Blu-Ray but oh well.

  105. Profile photo of dianne
    dianne Female 18-29
    80 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 2:45 am
    I have a Wii and I love it.

    For a while now, I`ve been thinking that I probably won`t get a PS3 until it`s extremely dirt cheap and actually works. If I ever decide to get one.

    The 360 though, screw that. I had too much trouble with the Xbox to bother with them again. Maybe another 10 years down the road when they`ve actually figured out what they`re doing. Their controllers are horrible..

    Anyway, if I want nice graphics, I do have a computer. Not that I care about graphics. I`m a huge mud fan after all. :)

  106. Profile photo of madmax11
    madmax11 Male 18-29
    733 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 5:08 am
    change the settings on ur screen and the PS3 should be just perfect.
    PS3 all the way
  107. Profile photo of Fermented
    Fermented Male 13-17
    119 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 5:56 am
    RyanF701

    "Wii is defiantly made for gameplay and fun, if I want graphics I have a computer."

    Exactly my point!

    I am probably the one of the few on this forum that doesn`t own a new system yet, but I do know quite a bit for each of the systems.

    Each is different and unique, the PS3 with insane power and Blue-Ray drives, X-Box with great graphical capabilty and FPS`s (though, the PS3 could outshine it, it was not so apparent in this video), and then there is the Wii.

    The Wii is a new perspective on how to play your games, which is purely fun. Sure, it will not get you with it`s sub-par (with PS3 and X-Box 360 setting it) graphics, but what is has on its side is innovation.

    To me, innovation is what keeps me from playing my P.C. (which I must say, can graphically match or beat any of the consoles anyway) all day, and this is what the videogame industry sorely needed, a fresh way to play and enjoy gaming.

    +A work, Nintendo.

    -Fermented

  108. Profile photo of Rakuru
    Rakuru Male 13-17
    59 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 7:43 am
    Oh, BTW:

    XBox 360 has 3.2 GHz PowerPC with 3 dual-threaded processor cores and 3.2 GHz Cell processor with 7 single-threaded processing units cores (which are not directly comparable anyway). Besides that RAM and such are very nearly identical for both, and I still don`t get why everyone is wowed by the big numbers of cores the PS3 has.. Which are single instead of dual and not comparable anyway. I just think X360 and PS3 will probably even have some games that look better on one throughout their life depending on what system the development team intentionally or otherwise focuses on making beautiful. So it comes down to other stuff than technology for me.

    And I used to think that I just needed a computer and of course when Half-Life Episode 2 comes out or if I want to play a strategy game, I`ll still use it quite a bit but games like Dead Rising and awesome to play on HDTV and the controller works good for it. (Probably a good idea to get rid of black and white buttons.)

  109. Profile photo of eyesore
    eyesore Female 13-17
    170 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 10:58 am
    Ps3 sucks. I still can`t believe they ripped off Nintendo`s motion sensing controller. Yes, Nintendo gets ripped off by Sony... now where have I heard that before... oh yes ALL THE TIME.
  110. Profile photo of sims2luver
    sims2luver Female 13-17
    797 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 11:47 am
    XBOX 360 looks like it has better graphics than the other 2.
  111. Profile photo of moojuiceman
    moojuiceman Male 18-29
    924 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 1:29 pm
    me too fermented i havent got any of the new consoles yet but i`ve preordered a wii and it should be delivered by christmas
    its gonna be the best christmas EVER
    eyesore`s right sony are always ripping off nintendo and they dont even do it well

    ninty`s wiimote and nunchuk combo: 3 axis of sensing each, meaning it knows whether its tipped forward or back, side to side up and down, theres about 5 million odd positions it can detect

    PS3: barely even senses movement, and i havent seen a single game that uses it well or at all

    play zelda, its like you are actually holding links sword or hook shot or whatever, wii sports, in boxing it follows your moves exactly. now THAT makes something lifelike, graphics, don`t.

    i had an xbox and it was absolutely crap, so i swapped it for a gamecube and it has been great.

  112. Profile photo of thesupreme1
    thesupreme1 Male 13-17
    148 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 1:57 pm
    Xbox- Dead in 2 months. =(- Returned and got Zen:Vision M, Mp3 Player
    Gamecube still going- 1 year old on xmas though
    Ps2- still kicking over 4 years. Takes a bit to read games(2minutes maby) but it still works fine other then that.

    Got a wii too but can`t play it till x mas.

  113. Profile photo of pea_ooter
    pea_ooter Male 13-17
    986 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 2:51 pm
    my brother keeps saying that he want a stupid 360...why? cuz of graphics..... dude, chill out, its a few pieces of grass that look werid on the wii that will make it a crappy console... and the lines on the wii were cause its was a bad TV...
  114. Profile photo of ashwey
    ashwey Female 13-17
    943 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 3:56 pm
    xbox = best
    P3 = better
    Wii = worst
  115. Profile photo of barbiak4
    barbiak4 Male 13-17
    52 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 5:11 pm
    xbow wins no doubt, but id take the wii second just because the concept of using the nunchuck controller as a gun is cool even if it isn`t a new idea (for those who think motion sensetive controllers are new check out duck hunting for the nes) and of coures the ps3 stinks its only a little bit more powerfull than the xbox, but almost double the price
  116. Profile photo of RedNine
    RedNine Male 13-17
    99 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 7:29 pm
    The PS3 killed the 360 in all but the last bit of gameplay.
    However. Graphics and XBL is all the 360 has on its side. The PS3 has great and free online, great graphics, a motion sensing controller, and way more exclusively awesome games. The Wii also has a lot of exclusives, some of which are good, and was the Wiimote and Nunchuck.
    I saw it`s way too early to start comparing them together. The PS3 has had only three weeks to get its stuff together, as with the Wii, whereas the 360 came far earlier and knew how to work its graphics engine. It`s hardly fair to start comparing them when the two new consoles are just trying out new things. Apparently all MS focuses on is high graphic levels, and online. Sony and Ninty both work on graphics, and also try to bring in revolutionary gameplay.
    Why do you think the 360`s been out for a year? Because MS wanted to beat competition when it arose because they had a year headstart.But on the ohter hand, PS3 has a other 360-graphic killing ga
  117. Profile photo of Rakuru
    Rakuru Male 13-17
    59 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 8:16 pm
    All I know is Perfect Dark Zero (esp. multiplay)and Dead Rising have great gameplay and are X360 exclusives. =) And are so far are the only two X360 games I`ve played.
  118. Profile photo of Kraken
    Kraken Female 18-29
    178 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 9:07 pm
    I`d rather have an Xbox 360.
  119. Profile photo of joeyhndc
    joeyhndc Male 18-29
    332 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 9:07 pm
    The Wii does have the first truly motion sensing controller. Duck hunt was based on the light gun, which had a color sensor built in (you could win at duck hunt by shooting a black t-shirt) And duck hunt is one of the best gameplay experiences I`ve ever had. I still pop it in from time to time. Also, the PS3 controller detects motion, but the Wiimote can calculate its exact position and orientation in 3D space. To boot, I haven`t had a single problem with a nintendo system to date. Hell, my 16 year old NES works great.
  120. Profile photo of joeyhndc
    joeyhndc Male 18-29
    332 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 9:09 pm
    With the Wii they were probably using the component cables that ship with the console. Composite cables (about 20$) will increase the res to 480p (dvd quality).
  121. Profile photo of DoughnutBoy
    DoughnutBoy Male 13-17
    701 posts
    December 9, 2006 at 9:51 pm
    the 360 look so much better than the ps3. but the wii kicks so much fkn ass
  122. Profile photo of kikikitkat
    kikikitkat Female 13-17
    152 posts
    December 10, 2006 at 10:06 pm
    Okay, I know this was posted a long time ago but it still pisses me off all the same:

    ""Wii SUCS!!!!!!!!!!!!I am getting a PS3.even though for me it was a close between PS3 & Xbox360"
    Exactly what I`d expect a female to say.

    If you didn`t notice, Nintendo`s console is like 3 times cheaper than either the PS3 or 360, plus its aiming for gameplay, not graphics.

    Do your research before you judge on one viewing alone."

    A female, huh? And I bet that you think we`ll be too busy judging controllers because we`re painting our nails. Next time you make a decision that it happened only because a female did it, read the many posts of guys saying they like it based of graphics alone.

  123. Profile photo of Pepsic91
    Pepsic91 Female 13-17
    243 posts
    December 11, 2006 at 3:27 pm
    go xbox go!
  124. Profile photo of wtfyousob
    wtfyousob Male 18-29
    56 posts
    December 11, 2006 at 5:52 pm
    ok, long story short: SCREW MOTION SENSITIVITY!!!
    nobody will probably ever read this but i`d rather sit on the couch knowing all of the usuall button positions then having to remember the whole new demension added by having to move the controller around. I`d probably make mistakes by accidentally moving the controller in some way anyway. In the video the 360 looked pretty good, the ps3 was ok but it was too @#$%-ing bright, and the wii looked, well.... bad. its probably mostly the way they recorded the wii portion. Most peope are forgetting that the wii also needs time for developers to improve its graphics, and almost nobody pointed out that the 360 needs time to improve although it has been out for a year. If you look at the upcoming title for the xbox: unreal championship 2007 (or something like that) you`ll see how much the graphics have gotten better compared to the launch titles, I just wanted to use that as a comparison of how much better wii/ps3 will look im a year or two
  125. Profile photo of wtfyousob
    wtfyousob Male 18-29
    56 posts
    December 11, 2006 at 5:54 pm
    ps: i have a 360
  126. Profile photo of -NeonCarrot-
    -NeonCarrot- Male 13-17
    1498 posts
    December 12, 2006 at 7:31 pm
    Wii looked like an N64 game.
  127. Profile photo of XxXkingxXxX
    XxXkingxXxX Male 13-17
    52 posts
    December 14, 2006 at 8:32 am
    hey guys check out this site kool website here make surteto leave a rating for the site and a comment in the guestbook
  128. Profile photo of j_pratt_2003
    j_pratt_2003 Male 13-17
    68 posts
    December 15, 2006 at 5:32 pm
    The Wii is easily the best. My m8 got one. Played on it for about 10 minutesand i was hooked. Yeh i may not have the grapics the biggest ram or whatever but it`s wayyyy more fun than the other two. So i think that Wii is the Best. But then i don`t have much care for graphics unlike my brother to whom graphics are everything
  129. Profile photo of soro
    soro Male 13-17
    693 posts
    January 15, 2007 at 4:45 pm
    Xbox 360 looked better than all of them- I haven`t noticed the blurriness of the Wii until now. Geez. lol, but I`m a proud Wii amd Xbox 360 owner anyway. lol
  130. Profile photo of soro
    soro Male 13-17
    693 posts
    January 15, 2007 at 4:47 pm
    and*. ha.
  131. Profile photo of cheataweb
    cheataweb Male 13-17
    32 posts
    May 20, 2007 at 11:25 am
    The graphics on the ps3 look identical to my cr*ppy ps2, x360 pwns all
  132. Profile photo of currybandit
    currybandit Male 18-29
    208 posts
    March 2, 2008 at 9:11 am
    360 rapes

Leave a Reply