If Humans Disappeared

Submitted by: Timicus 11 years ago in Science

Estimations of what would happen if humans just vanished. Sounds nice.
There are 138 comments:
Male 1
`xtreme_dude`: Chimps wouldn`t evolve into humans. Chimpanzee`s and modern-day humans share a common ancester, meaning they both arose from one species (a process called speciation) gradually evolving into what we see them as today.

Darwin said species are just a snapshot of evolution, because things are constantly changing. Like if you took a photograph of yourself everyday until you died - it would slowly change.

P.S. you shouldn`t fear offending somebody`s religious beliefs. Religious people don`t hesitate to offend your own beliefs with their indoctrination and presumption.

0
Reply
Male 352
liberal BS..
0
Reply
Male 447
ive always wished to breathe in fresh!!!air but too bad :(
0
Reply
Male 1,370
wow its so great these people think sssoooo positive.and if evolution is correct, whick I belive in and sorry if im insulting somones religion,wouldn`t chimps re evolve into humans?
0
Reply
Female 144
this is gay i cant read it
0
Reply
Male 1,079
suree.....
0
Reply
Female 963
Wow... the link was interesting but these long debates are simply amusing :-)
0
Reply
Female 36
tealcandtrip
Actually, Most methane Gas is made from Rice, Not cows.
0
Reply
Male 738
We go into nuclear winter, winter subsides, species spread out, pretty smart monkeys start walking on thier hind legs in order to survive the harsh enviorment, they evolve, they breed, they become humans, humans [email protected]#$ everything up, and we are right where we started. Crap!
0
Reply
Female 13
Awww, thanks!
0
Reply
Male 269
gee, all for me, i`m flattered, actually i believe you think everyone else is a brainless idiot & you consider yourself an under appreciated genius, on a subject like this, scientists do work on both sides & come to opposite conclusions, only if it`s alarming does it get attention, kind of like if i state broj is a kind rational minded thinker, doesn`t get much attention, but if i say your one of the most judgmental, accusatory, full of hot air persons, i`ve dealt with in recent times, then i get a reaction

btw, please don`t "pop", it`s ok that you created an account just so you could school me & ended up spreading you fears all over iab, it`s really ok, welcome aboard!

0
Reply
Female 1,120
it was too small to read. I couldn`t read it.
0
Reply
Female 13
Oh, for god`s sake, Saintnick! Just because my opinion is different from yours it doesn`t mean you have to post links like"MASS EXTINCTION UNDERWAY". Once again, you seem to have missed the point; I do not support mass extinction, nor does the original link ("If humans dissapeared") say that. It merely shows a possible scenario if mankind dissapeared, but that doesn`t mean the author is trying to convince everyone to commit suicide! It is underlining the impact people have on the environment. But of course, if someone who refused to be brainwashed by teachers, also refused to let them brainwash him into a correct interpretation of texts . . .
0
Reply
Female 13
Umm, by the way, what`s with the "shake that ass" flash?? Honestly, you must be one ver, very, very resented person.
0
Reply
Female 13
saintnick, really, you shouldn`t take criticism in such a way.
It`s not healthy. People have different opinions on different matters, but you can`t actually expect me to agree with you on the fact that there is no proof that global levels of some gases were lower before than they are now.
Wanna know why? because if you took the time to do some serious research, you`d find that scientists have been carrying out investigations for years to study human impact on the environment. you tell me to stay in school and be careful with brainwashing teachers . . .
let me just tell you that I do not base my opinions on what other people tell me, but on my own judgement; drawing conclusions from what I can see and understand, not simply denying facts based on nothing.
0
Reply
Male 269
i don`t think humans are the cause, nor do i believe anyone can prove or dis-prove this, honestly just like death & the most popular afterlife, i think certain folks feel a calling to claim they have a grasp on what is impossible to comprehend

& just because there is no valid argument against, does not make it true

0
Reply
Male 2,605
What are your sentiments on global warming, saintnick?
0
Reply
Male 269
in case anyone else is interested in this guesswork:
"gaia: an atlas for planet management" norman myers

http://www.well.com/user/davidu/sixthext...

0
Reply
Male 269
oh broj on behalf of all those seemingly brainless idiots please..

http://flashgamesite.com/funnyflashmovie...

0
Reply
Male 269
wow broj, since there is no precedent there is nothing to measure or validate hence just a guess, gut feel, psychic prediction, agenda

to say, it "may" be a good idea, or perhaps why not "just in case", i can see this, to say it is happening, there is no proof just charlatans

humans are not powerful enough, not at billion or 100 trillion, it`s just not possible

to make the world inhospitable for humans not entirely possible but a much better case, since we have precedence. you cannot take the same matter & use it to destroy itself, it`s i m p o s s i b l e, the earth will take a natural course with or without humans with little to no effect

stay in school & careful about the brainwashing emotional rants of the teachers

0
Reply
Female 13
And before giving any stupid answer to my comment, I suggest you get yourself a copy of "Gaia: an atlas for planet management"
0
Reply
Female 13
Ok, this go to all those seemingly brainless idiots out there: 1) global temperature changes (as well as other physical and climatical changes on Earth) happen naturally; the problem is, not at the rate they are now. 2)gases contributing to the green house effect are indeed caused by rumiants and other sources, but once again, mankind has taken those levels to a critical point. 3) It is true, this is not some crap to take people`s money, as somebody mentioned above. 4) Earth would obviously be better off if mankind had never existed. However, that is not the case. "If Humans Dissapeared" is only meant to illustrate how long it really takes the Earth to recover from the various waste we throw. If you read it carefully, you will realise that at the very end, it mentions how, despite many harmful agents of pollution would go away with time if human activity ceased immediately, there are other things -like radiation- that takes millions of years to dissapear.
0
Reply
Female 41
Let`s all kill our selves! ....You go first, OK?
0
Reply
Male 269
tortilla_boy i don`t have any fictitious answers to the fictitious major issues people claim is wrong with the earth, sorry

you will just have to live your life & before you pass on realize all that crap folks filled your head with was just bs, i wuld keep one thing in mind, just because it sounds viable doesn`t mean it is

0
Reply
Male 2,605
"Overmann, we can start with you."

As long as everyone else followed, that`d be fine with me. Or were you trying to insult me?

"(animals i guess, but theyre just boring. and they probably wouldnt notice too much.)"

Humans *are* animals. And I think they would notice by the sheer fact that their species would still exist to notice.

0
Reply
Male 42
[quote]On 10/15/2006 3:13:00 AM saintnick wrote: evil_noodle without a shred of proof whatsoever, you sound like all the other driveling idiots of the world, you have no proof, if all it takes is watching tv & popular opinion to convince you of something then watch tbn & hand over your money to the largest bank in the world or better yet let that babbling idiot barbara streisand teach you moral righteousness, what would you do if popular opinion changed direction & claimed the earth was just fine, complain that humans should try harder to destroy it, which is impossible to do attention people, the earth is fine, charlatans will keep brainwashing you claiming it`s broken so they can receive more money to convince more people & so on, stop listening & they are out of a job or power[/quote]
How is Earth fine?
0
Reply
Male 1,231
Actually nature has a surprisingly good way of healing its self. And as for alot of people saying its bull sh*t, i think they should do some research before they properly judge the article- for example, most concrete buildings are much younger than 200 years old before they are considered to be structurly unsafe.
0
Reply
Male 269
evil_noodle without a shred of proof whatsoever, you sound like all the other driveling idiots of the world, you have no proof, if all it takes is watching tv & popular opinion to convince you of something then watch tbn & hand over your money to the largest bank in the world or better yet let that babbling idiot barbara streisand teach you moral righteousness, what would you do if popular opinion changed direction & claimed the earth was just fine, complain that humans should try harder to destroy it, which is impossible to do

attention people, the earth is fine, charlatans will keep brainwashing you claiming it`s broken so they can receive more money to convince more people & so on, stop listening & they are out of a job or power

0
Reply
Female 357
What about pets, or animals in zoos or pet stores or cages. What about nuclear plants caollapsing? Well well I think that people have ruined this world so bad it would not be able to just `heal` on its own if us people just disapear.
0
Reply
Female 133
Damn. I`m not hoping for any giant asteroids or something similar yet, though. Actually, I don`t think I ever will.
0
Reply
Male 42
I say we all kill ourselves.............please?
0
Reply
Female 1,158
This ticked me off. The end.
0
Reply
Female 68
^^^ Nice. Lol.

It`s kind of sad to see what we`ve done to Earth (as this shows), but at the same time, this is blown out of proportion in a few places.

0
Reply
Male 3,631
Overmann, we can start with you.
0
Reply
Male 3,631
This was really stupid in some specific areas, but interesting in the overall general picture. Doesn`t make me want to go out and kill myself, though. Some points of it`s stupidity? Where do they get the information that leads them to think that all "metal and glass" buildings will necessarily collapse within two-hundred years? Oh, and this is my favorite: that within 100-200 years, all BRIDGES will collapse! What are they talking about? There are roman bridges that have survived in Italy for over 2,000 years! Where do they get this information? It`s a little dodgy, so I don`t necessarily embrace the entire picture since a sum is not more than the whole of it`s parts.
0
Reply
Male 182
(animals i guess, but theyre just boring. and they probably wouldnt notice too much.)
0
Reply
Male 182
if humans were wiped off the earth...who would be there to enjoy it?
0
Reply
Male 2,605
All humans should be wiped off the face of the Earth, most definitely.
0
Reply
Male 98
k.
0
Reply
Male 361
wow pretty amazing
0
Reply
Male 1,030
LET`S DO IT!! SERIOUSLY
0
Reply
Male 4
wow...
0
Reply
Male 211
And what about only fu$#ing hippies dissapear form the surface of the Earth so we can save the world from being covered with bullsh#t?

0
Reply
Male 9
humans have fu/cked up this planet beyond repair if we all vanished the world would be a wounderful place again
0
Reply
Male 2,510
Toxic waste can remain deadly for two million years!! Damn! Is Mr Burns aware of this?

lol!

0
Reply
Male 269
again, where is the proof, maybe if environMENTALs disappeared, in about 5 minutes everyone could stop worrying about something that there is no proof is happening

only one comment do i have toward these knuckleheads, there is more than 2 pounds of living bacteria in each environmental charlatan, we should by any means necessary set free

0
Reply
Male 14
Alright, lemme `splain something to all y`all in words you can`t understand because most of you have an incomprehensible sense of logical reasoning. Just because an isotope like the oh-so-scary Pu-239 has a long half-life of 24,000 years and thus is radioactive for 100,000 years mean its dangerous? Your thought process seems to be "Well, I am no scientist, but 100,000 is a big number, and that was a cool photoshop filter used on that poster, so... yes." The correct answer is actually no. Tiredofnick, it only took me 15 seconds to find a link. http://russp.org/BLC-3.html . There you go, that puts the biggest one right out of the way. But no one here who gave this stupid poster a rating above 1 is going to read this article. This article wasn`t made with special photoshop filters; plus, it cites sources, and you have to read. Go ahead everyone, give your expert testomony, you strong, highly regarded authorities on ignorance.
0
Reply
Female 3
Okay, let`s all commit suicide together! AAAND GO!
0
Reply
Male 1,111
tiredofnicks you need to think a little more logical before you freak out about this.
1) The VERY longest any nuclear waste can last is 1 million years, and that`s only a theory for the one stockpile of waste in britian because of it`s massive size it`ll take that long to become harmless. If it was moved and "thinned" out it would take less time.

2) Your little "fact" about nuclear power plants only using 4% of the energy they produce, lol. Think about it, everything produces energy, when you walk you are using and converting energy, and most of that energy builds up on your skin and dissipates, so you, yourself are not an efficient energy machine, that little 4% `fact` is either fake or made up by people going for the "shock" value.

0
Reply
Female 23
read Ishamel
0
Reply
Male 1,521
Nuclear waste remains deadly for up to 2 millon years!!!!!!!!!!!!! Shoud we let that bastard terroris president of Iran to make more nukes. and the north Korean idiot to keep on with his nuclear tests? Both of them must Dien!!!!!!
0
Reply
Female 576
meow?
wow things would go very well for the
planet without us wouldnt it??
0
Reply
Female 70
That`s actually pretty interesting.
0
Reply
Male 278
im tired of humans pissing on themselves.
0
Reply
Male 5,094
Feel free to browse the database above and post links that proves me wrong.
0
Reply
Male 5,094
bapinney: Yes, much but not all of the actual reactive mass can be transmuted into other, less dangerous materials. What CAN`T be transmuted is the irradiated concrete, steel, carbon, lead and other materials used in the buildings and that needs to be permanently disposed of.

It`s 4.30am here, I`m so tired I can`t see straight, and I can`t find any actual pages that state the exact amount of time it needs to be stored, but the ones I found take permanent disposal for granted.

From Disposal of high-level radioactive waste by the French Nuclear Agency:
Paragraph IV, line 12:

[quote]"With a suitable choice of waste packaging, backfill, and geological environment, the radioactive materials should remain isolated from man`s environment for many tens of thousands of years at least.[/quote]
"

http://www.nea.fr/html/brief/brief-03.html

Link to a HUGE database of nuclear-related issues:
http://www.radwaste.org

Male 994
Hey remember this Dinosuars once existed and ruled the world. (Unless you of you wants to argue about this it`s fact) Quite a bit of time later and we have nothing but the occasional fossil that shows up that confirms their existence
0
Reply
Female 1,572
interesting...
0
Reply
Female 65
ENVIRONMENTALISTS! not like they actually do anything about it. Just complain.
0
Reply
Male 70
well said KMeTG. I had no idea there was such hostility to the ideas of incredibly well-evidenced phenomenon like pollution and global warming here on IAB. Really, I`d like to join the debate, but I think I`d just make people more angry by giving them evidence...
0
Reply
Male 1,265
The truth is, we haven`t been here long enough to even begin to guess whether or not things like global warming would happen anyway. Some evidence suggests that the world is on a cycle, and that ice-ages and warm periods of high sea levels destroying coastal cities might be perfectly normal. I don`t know about that.

But what I do know is that pumping out millions of tonnes of Carbon Dioxide every year, along with toxic waste lasting longer than we have even existed as a species, lead in the atmosphere, CFCs, and over-depletion of natural resources like fish can`t be helping.

It`s up to us to make sure that our children have a world they can live in safely.

0
Reply
Male 1,265
Let me illustrate something for you all.

If the timeline of the existence of life on Earth can be scaled down into one fully-grown adult male holding his arms out away from his sides, then the entire history of human culture can be erased with a single stroke with a nail file across his middle finger.

Since life began - which was around 3 billion years ago - the climate of the planet has always been in balance with the life that was on it.

Early humans appeared maybe a few million years ago, with the roots of human civilization dating back possibly 20,000 years. At that point, humans began to take effect, needlessly hunting other animals to extinction, including the sabre-tooth tiger and woolly mammoth to name 2 examples.

However, human pollution really kicked off only a couple of centuries ago.

Billions of years of balance has been thrown out by the events of 200 years ago onwards.

Humans are destructive as drat and we all know it.

0
Reply
Male 943
haha get this:

radio-active.
what an incredible term.

pretty green glow, too.

That was the first haiku I got from the haiku-o-matic

0
Reply
Male 943
ok guys chillout, and you don`t buy this? how hard-headed are you people? yeah, it`s a myth, just like global warming.
0
Reply
Male 14
I can`t believe all you people just got bought off with some crappy little poster that doesn`t even cite sources? ARE ALL OF YOU THAT UNINTELLIGENT AND INCAPABLE OF CRITICAL THINKING? There are so many inaccuracies with that poster, I can`t even begin. Tiredofnicks, you are what`s "irresponsible and shortsighted". Most nuclear waste only needs to be stored for 10-50 years until it`s practically harmless. The rest can be dealt with by transmutation and other methods. My god, I`m at a loss for words at how moronic you are all. I just--, uh, you people should die-- you are what`s wrong with society.
0
Reply
Male 52
also my throies on human extinction,
#1, nuclear fall out, permant nuclear winter, only the fat kids survive, (they have blubber to keep warm)
#2, in 5 millon years (if we last that long) scientists say the suns soposed to implode in on itself and spray mass amount of radiation though the solar system, once again only roaches and fat kids survive,
#3, chuck norris gets bored and goes to town round house kicking all goverment officals down to local levels, anarchy ensures, we become canniblists, eat the fat kids, and skinny people survive this time
0
Reply
Female 284
Tourettes, I don`t think saying that insects should "die they suck," is hardly a wise viewpoint to have. Not to mention that bit about how "gay" NASA`s shuttles are.
0
Reply
Male 52
"By then, they`ll be as much roaches as we are now."
hey just letting you know, theres an estimated 100 roaches per 1 human in the world, theres already alot more of them than us
0
Reply
Male 957
tired of nicks, your viewpoints are ignorant. second time around i dont believe this garbage. we made the world better, and theres a number of species that should go down with us because they suck. my last post i mostly mentioned insects. they should die they suck.

nuclear power isnt bad!!!!! damn europeans you have it too its not americans that have it we mostly use coal. if nuclear waste is so bad just launch it into space. but we cant use crappy ass rockets or the GAY SHUTTLES NASA has. a big cannon can shoot this stuff into space into empty regions so it wont be our problem anymore!!!!!!

0
Reply
Male 5,094
On the other hand, what`s to say that what we humans are doing isn`t natural? What if this is just the next necessary step in evolution, or if you`re a creationist the way God/Shiva/Odin/Allah/Bob intended it? ;-)
0
Reply
Male 5,094
Rant of the day.

I won`t enter the global warming discussion but I have to say this: I can`t understand how anyone can justify nuclear power. The waste from every nuclear reactor in use today will still be lethal in several hundred thousand years.

Several hundred thousand years.

It`s so much time that it`s unfathomable, that it just becomes a number. What our generation is saying to the next two thousand generations or so is "Here, have these piles of slag that kills anything that comes close to them, we created them because we wanted cheap electricity. Keep them safe or well, you`ll die. What`s that? You don`t want them? Not our problem."

Nuclear power is irresponsible and shortsighted. We, as the only species that can make long-term plans should know better.

Oh, and did you know that nuclear power plants has an energy efficiency of something around 4%? That means that only 4% of the energy emitted by the reaction can be converted to usable power like electricity.

0
Reply
Male 102
Even if the timeline isn`t 100% accurate, the truth is the Earth would be better off without mankind. But if we keep raping it, the Earth won`t support us any more and we will all face extinction. Obviously the link isn`t telling us all to kill ourselves. Humans have seriously messed up the balance of nature, and we need to change or we will all die out. The great tragedy would be taking other, innocent species with us.
0
Reply
Male 163
sure cows put out more carbon dioxide than humans and their machines, but there are so many cows because we breed them.
0
Reply
Male 220
hey lets save the earth lets kill our selvs... I CALL SHOT GUN lol
0
Reply
Male 220
well that was intresting and yet creepy how some one would be able to say that but what if the worrld dident become a better place? would it just collaps what???????
0
Reply
Male 53
Give us time, we will wipe ourselves out soon enough.
0
Reply
Male 506
""they`d dig up human fossils and be like holy $hit zomgs wtf."

I found that quite hilarious, roaches will become noobs ><"


I second that.

0
Reply
Female 58
"why don`t all the people concerned with overpopulation/pollution/whatever don`t kill themselves off first so that they no longer contibrute to the problem?"
Good Grief spoonfork... It`s genius! They should start right away! Oh, and if the world was suddenly so perfect, who would enjoy it? We don`t know that a people-less earth is a better one really..
0
Reply
Male 733
lol. interesting if not hard to visualise...
0
Reply
Female 36
Another thing being, if we all did just .... go... some might leave the TV on, the gas on etc.etc.
0
Reply
Female 2,552
STEPHIE1954, that probably won`t even be there in 500 years.
0
Reply
Female 2,552
That would be really nice. That`s the way the world should be,
0
Reply
Male 111
HOLY DUMB drat. What is this poo?
0
Reply
Female 1,426
sounds awesome!
0
Reply
Female 501
i cant wait til we disappear :-)
0
Reply
Female 511
Hrm... doubtful on the CO2 emissions bit... CO2 would still be high since there`s the natural cycle of greenhouse gases rising and falling. And that`s hoping a volcano doesn`t erupt. Volcanoes put more CO2 in the atmosphere than humans could ever dream of.
0
Reply
Male 578
"wouldnt it be cool if we could all just dissapear for 50 years then come back> the world would be a better place..."

What!? No it wouldn`t! That would suck! That would be like the complete opposite of cool.

0
Reply
Female 430
Sad and pointless, without anything what is the point of clean anything
0
Reply
Female 228
wow... were pretty bad huh? ;-/ :-(
0
Reply
Male 713
No one would be around to care if the enviroment is nice. It wont make the spiders smile, the elephants dance. And I dont think methane would be gone everything craps


but I must say

"they`d dig up human fossils and be like holy $hit zomgs wtf."

I found that quite hilarious, roaches will become noobs ><

0
Reply
Male 363
Ya mum... roaches will never develop to be intelligent until they can grow an internal skeleton, stand on their hind legs, develop sweat glands (which leads to speach development as it frees up the lungs- no longer having to pant to stay cool) and evolve a brain big enough to capacitate such activity. By then, they`ll be as much roaches as we are now.
0
Reply
Male 187
thats all a load of bull$hit. heres my theory: humans die because we all kill ourselves with nuclear war and the whole world is in a state of nuclear winter and everything dies and roaches are the only living species on the planet (coz as u noe roaches are immune to radiation) and so roaches survive by eating other roaches and then in a billion or so years roaches evolve and the radiation subsides and other species form but then roaches are the dominant species just like humans are now and they have evolved to become extremely intelligent and build roach cities and are smarter than us humans now and they`d dig up human fossils and be like holy $hit zomgs wtf. (dam thing censors the word C!O!C!K so i cant spell c-o-c-kroaches)
0
Reply
Female 125
Wow - we sure have messed the earth up...
0
Reply
Female 296
Wow, 196 posts? Well, 197 now...

Man, I`m pathetic. -_-;;

0
Reply
Female 296
O_O Never has my favourite badge been more appropriate...

"Save the planet. Kill yourself."

I`ve had that badge for three years, too...

0
Reply
Female 124
Voluntary Human Extinction is a real movement. I think rather than killing oneself they promote not breeding. Somehow I doubt it will take off, seems like we`d rather just breed ourselves into extinction through overpopulation. Though it would be nice if we could find a middle ground.
0
Reply
Male 363
Yeah, thats a no. Nitrogen is supposed to be in the air, it makes up 70 percent of it, in fact.
Wooden bridges last for much longer than this proposes. There are wooden bridges well over that mark that are still standing strong.
Glass doesn`t decay. It can but it doesn`t decay.
0
Reply
Male 1,882
There is an equal amount of evidence disproving global warming and all that hoo-hah. I believe in its existence to an extent, but I don`t think it`ll have "catastrophic effects" on the world.

Funny, how *everyone* predicted massive hurricanes destroying the gulf coast of the US and we haven`t had even one major hurricane THREAT, let alone one to actually hit.

0
Reply
Male 1,882
The Greenie`s true dream: extinction of Humans.
0
Reply
Female 1,697
that would be nice
0
Reply
Male 1,217
^LOL SOUTHPARK

natural global warming is crap. its CARS and INDUSTRIES and like... MAN MADE stuff mostly, isnt it?

0
Reply
Female 302
LETS MAKE A BIG GAY PILE!
0
Reply
Male 737
ok, what I want to know is, how long would it take Michael Jackson to decay?
0
Reply
Male 62
[quote]Ahh, for the benefit of the world humans must become extinct. But then they cannot enjoy the better world...[/quote]
we already have enjoyed the better world, before we began to destroy it.
woot45, so the building wouldnt erode, animals being hunted would still be hunted and dying out? fxcking hell, think about it.
0
Reply
Male 2,057
wow, the times.

it seems that the earth would be better off without us in most cases!

0
Reply
Female 408
Ahh, for the benefit of the world humans must become extinct. But then they cannot enjoy the better world...
0
Reply
Female 406
spooky
0
Reply
Male 1,406
"Oh, yes, humans are evil. We should all hate ourselves. Death to us!

What I want to know is why don`t all the people concerned with overpopulation/pollution/whatever don`t kill themselves off first so that they no longer contibrute to the problem? I never hear any volunteers."

I`m killing other people first, just killing me wouldn`t make enough of a difference. ;)

0
Reply
Male 95
This is a load of bs. Global warming is mostly a natural process.
0
Reply
Female 1,398
man, if we all just disappeared, I bet you NONE of that sh*t would happen. Don`t believe it for one second.
0
Reply
Male 70
Woo! First submission!

And now everyone is pissed off! Woo![?]!

In regards to the methane bit, Earth naturally cycles methane through its atmosphere, but usually it is kept in a state of equilibrium with CH4 in its organic [fixated] state. [btw, I believe termites give off more methane than cows, overall] but human agriculture and energy production are throwing off the balance a bit, which is unfortunate because methane is a very extreme greenhouse gas, if I remember GLG 201.

Wow I`m such a Geology nerd/Environmentalist.

Woo?

0
Reply
Female 339
Jesus, its just a "what if" thing, we arent being told by the government to become extinct lol

I thought it was very intersting, how millions of years of history could be totally wiped out and reverse back to wild dinosaur era pretty much immediately if we werent around

0
Reply
Male 34
how the flip can endangered species recover within 24 hours?
0
Reply
Male 1,033
[quote]On 10/13/2006 8:27:41 AM videogamer wrote: I don`t buy this drivel for one second.[/quote]

Errr. Which bit?

0
Reply
Male 3,014
I don`t buy this drivel for one second.
0
Reply
Female 18
headwound that is freaking hilarious
0
Reply
Male 559

0
Reply
Male 194
Sylvester Stallone killed off the dinosaurs when a T-Rex gave him a dodgy look. I think humans will end more or less the same way.
0
Reply
Male 263
lolakitty72:

Maybe it was a flood..??

0
Reply
Female 1,972
The only thing they left out is what the earth does to itself...via volcanos & whatever space flings our way.
Just ask the dinosaurs...oh, thats right you can`t because a large whatnot wiped them out.(I`m still on the fence if it was a comet or an asteroid)
0
Reply
Female 284
I don`t think they`re suggesting we all just go "die," I think this just illustrates what an impact we have made on the world. And maybe suggesting that we need to do something to reverse all this, before everyone and everything on earth DOES die from all the poison in our air, water, and food.
But that`s just what I think.
0
Reply
Male 651
I bet this crap was made up by environmentalists.
0
Reply
Male 916
Tealcandtrip, why don`t you read up a bit? Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution... for a start. You`d realize that your post is not as great as you think it is.
0
Reply
Male 213
That doesn`t work. If you die in a developed country, they either embalm and burry or cremate. Both are terrible for the environment! XD

Besides, a few people comitting suicide is not as effective as convincing bus-loads of children to eat arsenic.

And that`s totally NOT my plan.

No.

That would be too easy.

I mean evil.

Evil as in wrong.

Wrong as in... never mind.

0
Reply
Female 11
So i guess the message is "do your part for the environment....die!"
0
Reply
Male 1,265
Oh, yes, humans are evil. We should all hate ourselves. Death to us!

What I want to know is why don`t all the people concerned with overpopulation/pollution/whatever don`t kill themselves off first so that they no longer contibrute to the problem? I never hear any volunteers.

0
Reply
Male 144
Not quite a lot of bull tealcandtrip. Once we are gone, most of the cows would be gone too as the majority of them are bred by us for food.
The other greenhouse gases are a by-product of mankind`s activities here on our planet
0
Reply
Male 957
nobody would replace us that would be cool. insects and pooheads like spiders, ants, wasps, bees, and other hostile species would take over! other mammals and reptiles would not survive. its worth having us here! we`re highly intelligent! and we make great food! and we do what no other species can!
0
Reply
Female 201
Heh, what a great post for my #100.
0
Reply
Female 27
I say we do it now :-p
0
Reply
Female 201
What a load of bull. The oceans and cows put out more methane than we ever did. Perhaps we should kill all the cows. The great majority of greenhouse gases are naturally created. We are not killing the earth; we`re just not making it look as pretty is the few places that we live in.
0
Reply
Female 1,984
^ Um... DMDekoth... the list of basically of man-made things decaying and stuff.

We don`t create animals. And they would just die anyway eventually.

0
Reply
Female 1,984
cool...
0
Reply
Male 888
They forgot that all the animals that are kept in homes/zoo`s/whatever would die of starvation..
And noone will be around to "stop" global warming! Hah!
0
Reply
Male 10
Toxic waste can remain deadly for two million years!! Damn! Is Mr Burns aware of this?
0
Reply
Female 412
I hate living in the city i`d do almost anything to move to the courntry you can smell the sh*t in the air around here, it`s disgusting

I`d hate to see aust in 500 years, fk that, there`s already too many people here

0
Reply
Male 178
wouldnt it be cool if we could all just dissapear for 50 years then come back> the world would be a better place...
0
Reply
Male 70
Link: If Humans Disappeared [Rate Link] - Estimations of what would happen if humans just vanished. Sounds nice.
0
Reply