Sept 1752

Submitted by: random66 10 years ago in Misc
http://www.trialsofgrizelda.com/harvest/September%201752.htm

Remember the dodgey calendar we saw? Well here"s the explanation
There are 25 comments:
Female 797
And why should I care?
0
Reply
Female 2
But, it had that explanation on the original link....
0
Reply
Female 2,552
COOoooL.
0
Reply
Female 364
WOOHOO! I`m a cousin again! My aunt Teresa had a new baby named Emily Ann today. Yay! Email me with your congratulations, everybody. [email protected]
0
Reply
Male 254
"Especially funny due to the fact that 666 isn`t the mark of the beast (according to recent interpritations and findings)...maybe they should put it back in...haha"

it could be either 666 or 616, depends on how you spell what ever the cesar`s name was ruling at the time written.

eh, either way our calender is retarded

0
Reply
Male 1,039
Naoscaire LOL now that is funny...

Especially funny due to the fact that 666 isn`t the mark of the beast (according to recent interpritations and findings)...maybe they should put it back in...haha

0
Reply
Male 1,383
Hmmm, interesting, but a nice explantion.
0
Reply
Male 1,115
hehehe, wasnt the explanation also on the original link? All you really had to do was explore around.
0
Reply
Male 571
What about the Catholic Church taking the year 666 out of the calender? Like, just TOOK a whole year out of a calender!
0
Reply
Male 4,431
^^Plus, I posted this link in the comment section of the original link the day *it* was posted. Of course, I know, very few people actually read all of the comments, but, it`s not like there were that many... :-(
0
Reply
Male 3,060
this wasn`t needed. there was an explanation on the calendar, you tard!
0
Reply
Male 181
it`s always fun to read about stuff like that
0
Reply
Male 2,057
^the latter
0
Reply
Female 1,398
that doesn`t make sense... either there WASN`T a september 3-13, or these people are stupid.
0
Reply
Female 231
this is relli boring...
0
Reply
Male 3,014
I think we should create a brand new time system for the electronic age, one that was calculated perfectly and required no adjustments. A day would be exactly as long as it took between any two times a latitude line to directly face the sun (so a little over or under 360 degrees of rotation). I don`t know how we would make it compatible with months, but we`d figure it out.
0
Reply
Female 811
^ Because we have an extra day every fourth year, and there`s daylight-savings.
0
Reply
Male 25
If we gain 6 hours every year, how come after 2 years morning isn`t night time, and night time isnt daylight?
0
Reply
Male 105
good followup to the other sept 1752 one!
0
Reply
Male 63
dumb..........
0
Reply
Female 399
The only true measure of time is day and night, and the seasons.

Everything else is just man-made ways to try and cut that up into equal parts, so it`s not all that anazing that it took a few tries to get it right.

0
Reply
Female 2,144
Why Don`t You Guys Get An Avatar? ^ It Looks Horribly Boring.
0
Reply
Female 95
I thought I was having a de ja vu moment, nice one.
0
Reply
Male 101
This was on two days ago!

Far out, IAB, get your act together!

0
Reply
Male 80
Link: Sept 1752 [Rate Link] - Remember the dodgey calendar we saw? Well here`s the explanation
0
Reply