Rockin' in the free world since 2005.

[Total: 60    Average: 2.9/5]
47 Comments - View/Add
Hits: 12339
Rating: 2.9
Category: Funny
Date: 01/23/06 02:26 AM

47 Responses to The Blame Czar

  1. Profile photo of buddy
    buddy Male 30-39
    10116 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 12:14 am
    Link: The Blame Czar - The person responsible for all of the Bush administration`s mistakes.
  2. Profile photo of jtc970
    jtc970 Male 13-17
    337 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 9:37 am
    b b but it`s Bush bashing, we can`t get enough of that can we.
    We hate America, We hate the voters, We hate anything republican, We are followers of the media, Movie stars and rappers tell us all we should know.
    W00t, I.A.B voted most anti-American website 2 years running! GO BUDDY!
  3. Profile photo of rhenretta
    rhenretta Male 18-29
    62 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 10:18 am
    too long for the same joke
  4. Profile photo of Wyvern32
    Wyvern32 Male 30-39
    3 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 12:29 pm
    There was a joke in there? I must have missed it. Pretty boring.
  5. Profile photo of RinjiHalfElf
    RinjiHalfElf Female 18-29
    335 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 12:42 pm
    Even more boring when you don`t have a sound card.
  6. Profile photo of Cobrabite
    Cobrabite Male 18-29
    21 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 1:17 pm
    I think Bush made alot of mistakes and such but jeez people we get the point. He sucks. Quit beating a dead joke.
  7. Profile photo of buddy
    buddy Male 30-39
    10116 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 1:33 pm
    Get a sense of humor, people. It`s a great American tradition to poke fun at the president. This goes back hundreds of years, and there`s nothing anti-American about it-- just the opposite-- it`s VERY American.
  8. Profile photo of Mat
    Mat Male 13-17
    1524 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 1:43 pm
    My favourite part was the first 4 seconds of nothing that took 10 minnutes to load.
  9. Profile photo of Doppel
    Doppel Male 18-29
    75 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 2:26 pm
    buddy, honest and respectable dissent is fine. For example, I disagree with Bush`s spending policies and I dissent with his proposed bill on the border situation. Stupid, pointless Bush-bashing and America-bashing, or "irresponsible dissent" as the spineless would say it, is much more common. Look at any liberal protest march or website and you will see what liberals call "dissent". Constant attacks from Hollyweird, the lamestream media, and the Dems cross the line from disagreement to propaganda. Some people just need to learn the difference between differing opinons and differing agendas.
  10. Profile photo of Doppel
    Doppel Male 18-29
    75 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 2:29 pm
    This video is just one of billions of attacks on conservatives. Apparently, liberals have to have their views reinforced hourly to cushion their egos. You almost never see conservatives do this stuff because conservatives have better things to do.
  11. Profile photo of buddy
    buddy Male 30-39
    10116 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 4:53 pm
    First off-- My perspective is someone who is not a member of a political party. I vote for about the same number of republicans as I do democrats.

    The truth is, whoever the other party, will also poke fun at the leader in power. You obviously never listened to Rush Limbaugh during the Clinton presidency if you think republicans don`t do the same thing when there is a democrat in the White House. And I mention Rush Limbaugh becuase he would do it with humor, which is very similar to this.

    Perhaps you are too young to remember the Clinton administration? My guess is that`s true.

  12. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 5:25 pm
    lol conservatives make me laugh. They will call someone a traitor, a murderer, anti-american, anti-freedom, saddam lover, etc. all for expressing a view that is factually accurate, but differing from their own. And then when a liberal rightfully makes fun of the king george, all we hear is "liberals do nothing but attack" "we don`t do that" whine whine whine.

    If you can`t be smart about it, conservatives, least you can do is be original.

  13. Profile photo of Mr.knowItAll
    Mr.knowItAll Male 18-29
    608 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 5:28 pm
    Actually, i never listened to Rush Limbaugh period. But your right buddy.... Its all just political satire & theres no harm done with you occasionally throwing a link or two out there...
  14. Profile photo of buddy
    buddy Male 30-39
    10116 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 5:48 pm
    I happen to be a talk radio fan. Trust me, Rush was absolutely skewering Clinton on a daily basis. Look back through American history, way before TV or radio was invented, and they`ve been doing the same to whoever the sitting president is, even guys like Lincoln.
  15. Profile photo of rosie51391
    rosie51391 Female 13-17
    223 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 6:59 pm
    as i was watching that i was trying to figure out where i`ve seen that guy from. he`s so familiar but i just cant figure out what he`s from! >.<
  16. Profile photo of brittbrat123
    brittbrat123 Female 18-29
    199 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 7:11 pm
    waaay too long to actually watch the whole thing...
  17. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 8:59 pm
    I do listen to Rush, and you apparently do not. Rush never lies on his program. If he did, our liberal media would be all over it. Most of the attacks on Bush I have seen are based on lies. Example: Bush lied us into war. Not true. Everything he said about the war was true. The so-called lies you heard were twistings of his words by the left. Another example: "LOL BUSH IS DUMB" Bush is obviously NOT dumb, since he did manage to win two consecutive presidential terms, run a successful business, get an honorable discharge from the Air National Guard after displaying exceptional flight skill, graduate from both Yale University and Harvard Business School, and go to war with terrorists when no one else would.....Look at Mr.knowItAll`s post and you will see the typical level of liberal dialogue. I stand by what I said about conservatives not doing that stuff. You never see anti-liberal clips and faked photographs on IAB. The liberal bias here is more than obvious.
  18. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 9:06 pm
    I am Doppel under a different name, by the way.
  19. Profile photo of buddy
    buddy Male 30-39
    10116 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 9:33 pm
    Indigo-- Do you realize this is satire? I know you`re probably too young to have been listening to Rush back when he was playing his comic satires of Clinton, but it`s the same thing. You need to learn to recognize when something is meant as a joke.
  20. Profile photo of jtc970
    jtc970 Male 13-17
    337 posts
    January 23, 2006 at 10:24 pm
    And some need to recognize when it`s overdone.
    We come here for when we are bored and to be entertained. But it seems like any crap can make it on this site as long as it attacks Bush. Remember more than half the country voted for him.
    The disrespect to those voters is out of control. There were alot of jokes about Clinton, but hey, when you get blowjobs while America pays you, you deserve jokes. Even things that have nothing to do with Bush get turned into Bush bashing, and most of the inane spewings are uneducated "Barbara Streisand" type quotes that speak nothing of the truth.
    What young kid growing up today would attempt to have a backbone and become an honest politician (Yes there are some, Why would they when all they can expect are personal smearings and intense lies. Rush is a far right talk show host, to claim it`s ok to disrespect 65% of American voters opinions constantly and on a daily basis just because some far right guy does doesn`t gain you any respec
  21. Profile photo of RinjiHalfElf
    RinjiHalfElf Female 18-29
    335 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 12:00 am
    Would we be Bush bashing as much if 9-11 hadn`t happened?

    Probabaly not.

    The media showing America only what they want to us to see doesn`t help either.

    Imagine what Gore would have done if 9-11 had happened? Then what kind of boat would we be in?

    Ah Phooey, too many ifs. I just hope we got the better man *prays*

  22. Profile photo of b3ach_bum
    b3ach_bum Male 18-29
    220 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 1:48 am
    Whoever is hunched over a desk late at night running this site is doing a good job, as its Alexa reviews and climbing rank can show. But when you beat a dead horse, the only thing thats not original is most of the political postings on this site.

    This dot-com should be a place people visit for their daily dose of anti-boredom. Instead, some links are promiscuously posted with a "yuk-yuk! Everybody hates Bush! This should get at least a 3.1!"
    I want to print these biased links, and blow my nose on them. Good links should be good links because they are amusing, controversial or funny, not because they appeal to an individual, or people who still watch MTV and allign themselves with whatever political beliefs are trendy.
    Yeah, these blatant liberal posts are overdone, and no longer funny. Ha ha. Not.

    "I hate conservatives, but I really hate liberals." -Matt Stone, South Park co-creator

  23. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 2:39 am
    "Rush never lies on his program"

    I laughed so hard when I read that. You need to read "Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot", "The way things aren`t", or look at "media matters" website. But I already know what you are going to say: "These are just facts and they are getting in the way of me believing what ever I want."

    Oh and bush did lie about the war. He made a multitude of claims that went against intelligence gathered at the time, so stop with the "bush told us nothing but the truth," your stupidity hurts my eyes.
    Unless you want to provide evidence supporting your claims, any of your claims, actually.

  24. Profile photo of jtc970
    jtc970 Male 13-17
    337 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 4:39 am
    "Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot"
    The epitimy of liberal propaganda, always beginning with personal bashing, and as we see, sometimes making it into the title itself.
    Pointing out articles a 2nd grader could have titled and probably wrote will prove nothing.
    so....
    Unless you want to provide evidence supporting your claims....

    shuttit

  25. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 2:41 pm
    Oh jtc970, why do you hate america so much? After all, more (54%) americans disapprove of bush`s job performance. http://pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm
    More Americans disapprove of the handling of Iraq, (50% vs 47%)http://pollingreport.com/iraq.htm. thus by supporting bush and Iraq you do nothing but disrespect the American voters. Why is it you have such hatred for this country and its people?

    About Rush Limbaugh`s lies:
    I understand if you don`t read books, they are complicated with all those words and such, it must hurt your head everytime you look at something that is bigger than a paragraph. "Rush limbaugh is a big fat idiot" is actually researched, unlike anything you see on TV. But here is a link that contains many of Limbaughs lies on a single subject. Now discrediting something because it is a liberal link is a logical fallacy

  26. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 2:44 pm
    called "poisoning the well" (i don`t assume you know what that means, but it means your dumb if you do so). http://www.rushlimbaughonline.com/articl...

    "shutit" Spoken like a true conservative, without a brain.

  27. Profile photo of jtc970
    jtc970 Male 13-17
    337 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 4:46 pm
    roflmao, I`ll let your words speak for themselves.
    BTW, I am not a conservative. I voted for democrats and republicans, these last few years democrats have shown me nothing but a personal agenda to smear anyone that does not agree with them. That is not good for America or it`s people.
    The young 18-29 year old voters might think it`s the norm though.
  28. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 5:40 pm
    Okay, You have me convinced you must be mentally challenged. If this is some sort of incidious plan where you will pop up with a well-reasoned, well-supported argument and completely through me off guard, then you better get to it.

    Cause I cant imagine anyone with a measurable IQ actually believes that democrats, alone, are guilty of having a "personal agenda to smear anyone that does not agree with them."
    In addition, a well reasoned human probably would not make a comment about my words speaking for themselves, because that falls under the "no sh*t" category of language comprehension.
    So my 30-39 year old conservative-in-denial please prove to me that you are not as moronic as you have made yourself out to be. Like this: If Buddy`s czar link is "disrespectful" to american voters, yet american voters disaprove of Bush. Then doesn`t that mean american voters are somehow anti-selves?

  29. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 5:40 pm
    (I love debating circles around you conservatives, you guys are walking contradictions) lol
  30. Profile photo of jtc970
    jtc970 Male 13-17
    337 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 6:02 pm
    I`m not going to argue with you on IAB. Especially since your only argument is
    Rush is fat, Conservatives have low IQ`s, and you have seen into my soul and know where I stand, "Conservative in denial"
    Feel free to make your world the way you want. If you want to call someone Big and fat, and tell me I have a low I.Q. feel free..I hope it makes you feel better.
    If you want to have a worthwhile rant about your beleifs visit therantpage.com, you may learn that you have been mislead by the very people you have been told to trust.

    Its not this one post that is disrespectful. IT is the mass quantities of anti-bush propaganda and the lack of any links from the other side.
    I know they have been submitted.. but somehow never make the cut..even though some seriously crappy stuff gets approved, as long as Bush is getting punched,insulted,thrown around, dancing, misquoted, cut and pasted or hated

  31. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 9:03 pm
    KnightmareOH, you are not debating. You are insulting. Democrats like you cannot see a difference, but there is one. You have not made one point so far. You seem to think debating consists entirely of insulting your opponent`s intelligence. Stop with the hypocrisy for at least your own sake.
  32. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 9:11 pm
    Media Matters, like moveon.org, is a liberal propaganda machine that has proven itself to be completely opposed to the truth. Al Franken is the most ironic liberal I have seen in a while. He writes books with titles calling people liars when he himself lies and misleads constantly. He is also very cruel in his "humor" and he has an anger management problem. KnightmareOH apparently has no idea how to identify a credible news source. I just go with the ones that have not been proven to be blatantly dishonest.
  33. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 9:20 pm
    The "mainstream" media is overwhelmingly liberal and it lies by both omission and outright falsehood. The USA Today doctored a photo of Condoleeza Rice to make her look evil. Primetime news networks costed Bush thousands of votes in the 2000 election by saying falsely that the polls were closed. They also say to this day that the U.S. Supreme Court appointed Bush, which is also an outright lie. Florida law allows a set time limit for recounting votes. The Florida Supreme Court more than doubled this time limit so that Gore could count the votes more than he was allowed to, so the U.S. Supreme Court overturned this decision and stopped the recount. All studies of all possible ways of counting votes still show Bush as the victor. Another lie: The NSA spies on random American citizens. The NSA actually spies on those U.S. citizens whose telephones have dialed or been dialed by phones confiscated from Al-Qaeda members......Lies like these are told and repeated by the med
  34. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 9:33 pm
    Hmm. It seems the text limit is really 991 characters and not the supposed 1000. KnightmareOH, Bush has never been proven to have lied about the Iraq war. Saddam did have weapons of mass destruction, and some of them were found. However, satellite photos showed trucks moving from suspected WMD locations in Iraq to Syria shortly before the invasion. Also, witnesses and spies have reported that Spetsnatz agents conducted an operation around that same time, leading one to believe that Russia moved Saddam`s weapons for him. This makes sense, considering the fact that Russia was the one that sold Saddam his weapons. This same pattern is happening with Iran; Russia is helping to build Iran`s nuclear facilities and it opposes sanctions against the terrorist-supporting nation. Even if the WMD data was completely false, this still does not mean Bush lied. Bush believed the intelligence. Britain, France, and Italy, who each gathered their own intel, agreed with the U.S.
  35. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 24, 2006 at 9:38 pm
    KnightmareOH, instead of denouncing others as mentally challenged, perhaps you should do some research, both on news and on the definition of debate. I have presented a case. You have done nothing other than recite fabrications from propagandistic organizations and insult conservatives` intelligence and integrity.
  36. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 1:17 am
    You have yet to provide a single link or documented case of anything you have said.
    Saddam had WMDs? evidence?
    Bush spies on US to Al-Queda calls? evidence?
    Al Franken lied? evidence?
    Russia moved Saddams WMDs? evidence?
    Bush won in florida recount in every study? evidence?
    Britain, France, and Italy`s intel matched our own? evidence?
    I think you will find that when YOU do some research, you will find very little if anything to corroborate any of what you have said.
    I want to see where you get your information.

    Are you begining to see where I get the right to insult conservatives intelligence and integrity?
    You act like you have access to the truth yet you cannot provide me with anything, outside of conspiracy theories or case examples, of lacking credibility in any of my sources. Earlier I discussed something called "poisoning the well" which is a logical fallacy, which is exactly what you are doing now.

  37. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 1:26 am
    If I provide a link that has an MP3 of Rush Limbaugh saying something that actually ended up being false, according to government documentation, then it doesn`t matter who did the information gathering as long as the information is accurate. You seem to have a problem with this, so provide a philosophical proof why the source is more important than the information that the source provides. I would have guessed its the other way around but then again, I critically think about things.

    Now I find this terribly funny that you actually stated that you have "presented a case". So hear is your chance to actually present a case, in which you provide evidence for what you claim or logical proofs for what you believe. This ought to be entertaining.

  38. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 1:52 am
    Everything I said can be corroborated with a simple search, a visit to the website that is the authority on the matter, or just by paying attention to news reports from a wide variety of sources. Just the idea that you would present Media Matters as a source is highly destructive to your credibility already. Most of the stuff I mentioned has been all over every news outlet for weeks. You are correct in that I cannot prove that the NSA does what it says it does or the recounts actually showed Bush won because I was not there to record the event. Just the same, you cannot make the same claim. You also have not given a shred of evidence to support your "case". I am only relating what I caught in news reports. I would appreciate it if you would stop with the insults. Your constant attacks on my intelligence only hurt you. All you have to do to see where I got my information is turn on the TV. Most of what I said is not contested by either party.
  39. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 1:55 am
    About what you said regarding Rush, it is possible to say something that is false yet not a lie. If Rush believed it to be true, but it was wrong, Rush did not lie. He was merely mistaken or perhaps he misspoke. In light of this, I find it ironic that you would ridicule my capacity for logical reasoning.
  40. Profile photo of Indigo_M
    Indigo_M Male 18-29
    354 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 1:57 am
    I have been nothing but polite to you and you have been nothing but rude to me and the other conservatives here. If you do not show civility, I will stop responding to your comments.
  41. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 11:08 am
    You keep making claims yet still I see no evidence. Like I said, I want to see your credible sources. I don`t buy this "not disputed by both parties" or "just watch TV" bullsh*t. I have never heard any of the alligations you made before. Honestly, it sounds like conspiracy cries and tinfoil theories to me, no better at critical thought then those who claim the Holocaust never happened or a missle hit the pentagon.

    If you cant even dictate to me one way in which Media Matters has mislead or lied, then how can you dispute their credibility as a source? And even so, under your logic, you must prove that their lie was made with knowledge that they knew it was a lie. Gee, it seems like anyone can be considered a credible source under your rule book, and yet you seem to actually claim that where I get MY information is somehow flawed. Are we begining to understanding where that isn`t logical?

  42. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 11:17 am
    But yes, you will stop responding to my comments, and it has nothing to do with "civility" (if thats what you want to call your behavior). Its because I have done exactly what you cannot, I have taken your comments, found the contradictions and flaws in them and exploited them. That must piss you off, to the point where, just like jtc970, you no longer can debate me.
    Look at his comments, theyre funny, and when I call him on his contradictions, all of a sudden, "I wont respond, because your only arguement is... (arguements I never made). go rant somewhere else" whine whine whine. Im beginning to see a pattern.

    And yes, I can give a shred of evidence to support my "case." The only thing I said was that Rush limbaugh was a liar, and provided a link with quotes and refutations. Now if you don`t believe he didn`t "lie", fine. But he still hasn`t corrected himself for his comments, which makes him dishonest.

  43. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 11:26 am
    So do me, yourself, and the rest of your fellow Americans a favor, if you cannot debate your arguements with facts or logical proofs, then don`t come here (or anywhere) and start talking sh*t about bush being right or liberal media, because your comments are meaningless without proof. and then you force me or another informed person like me to waste my time trying to weasel out of you a single post of evidence or logical claim, so that maybe I can learn where you conservatives learn all of your bush loving tactics.
    This is an international forum and its an embarassement to America when your representation makes it seem like our citizens don`t have a thought in our head, and will believe anything that is thrown at us. I know that isn`t true of our citizens and dispite you (or doppel or BCR or whatever the hell your name is) and others like you dragging us down, I intend not to have our nations intellect dragged in the mud.
  44. Profile photo of jtc970
    jtc970 Male 13-17
    337 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 6:04 pm
    In America, You must prove someone did something before calling them guilty. Not prove they didn`t do it to call them innocent.
    The sources you mention have proven and some will blatently tell you they are liberal, far left groups. Just read their site with an open mind, nothing to prove.
    I can debate you KnightmareOH, I just have better things to do, and would rather debate you in a place for debate, not IAB.
    You have not taken me up on my offer to debate on a forum meant for it, therefore I conclude, that it is you who fears a real debate. Without your mudslinging or insults you have nothing of substance.
  45. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 9:32 pm
    "The sources you mention have proven and some will blatently tell you they are liberal, far left groups."
    Why is it when I call upon logical fallacies, it falls on deaf ears. "poisoning the well" look it up. I`ll tell you what I told indigo/doppel. It is the information that must be judged, if they provide accurate information then please tell me why it is not acceptable? See you have been convinced that something is incorrect if it provides evidence that is contrary to your personal beliefs. I offer you to look at any example my "liberal" sources have provided faulty information.
    "Fact A is wrong because it came from source B" is a faulty way of thinking. If Moore said Fact A then does it change its validity if Limbaugh says Fact A as well. The answer is, has always been, will always be, no!
  46. Profile photo of KnightmareOH
    KnightmareOH Male 18-29
    285 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 9:41 pm
    PM me JTC with a forum from which you feel comfortable debating. If you can bring facts, evidence, and logical consistancy then I really have no problem debating someone whose premises of ideology are different from my own. But the problem is you have yet to display such a characteristic.

    I really want to see how much someone who enters a thread yelling "un-american", Acusing people of "hating america", only to accuse liberals of running a smear campaign, and continues to make claim after claim without any evidence, can really add to intelligent debate. So PM me jtc970.

  47. Profile photo of jtc970
    jtc970 Male 13-17
    337 posts
    January 25, 2006 at 10:42 pm
    THis video proves everything, Democratic agenda is smear smear smear, not look out for the american people. They call the war illegal, but yet don`t beleive it.
    The link provided is a forum for debate
    http://www.therantpage.com/forums/index....

Leave a Reply