Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
I really want to see how much someone who enters a thread yelling "un-american", Acusing people of "hating america", only to accuse liberals of running a smear campaign, and continues to make claim after claim without any evidence, can really add to intelligent debate. So PM me jtc970.
And yes, I can give a shred of evidence to support my "case." The only thing I said was that Rush limbaugh was a liar, and provided a link with quotes and refutations. Now if you don`t believe he didn`t "lie", fine. But he still hasn`t corrected himself for his comments, which makes him dishonest.
If you cant even dictate to me one way in which Media Matters has mislead or lied, then how can you dispute their credibility as a source? And even so, under your logic, you must prove that their lie was made with knowledge that they knew it was a lie. Gee, it seems like anyone can be considered a credible source under your rule book, and yet you seem to actually claim that where I get MY information is somehow flawed. Are we begining to understanding where that isn`t logical?
Now I find this terribly funny that you actually stated that you have "presented a case". So hear is your chance to actually present a case, in which you provide evidence for what you claim or logical proofs for what you believe. This ought to be entertaining.
Are you begining to see where I get the right to insult conservatives intelligence and integrity?You act like you have access to the truth yet you cannot provide me with anything, outside of conspiracy theories or case examples, of lacking credibility in any of my sources. Earlier I discussed something called "poisoning the well" which is a logical fallacy, which is exactly what you are doing now.
Its not this one post that is disrespectful. IT is the mass quantities of anti-bush propaganda and the lack of any links from the other side.I know they have been submitted.. but somehow never make the cut..even though some seriously crappy stuff gets approved, as long as Bush is getting punched,insulted,thrown around, dancing, misquoted, cut and pasted or hated
Cause I cant imagine anyone with a measurable IQ actually believes that democrats, alone, are guilty of having a "personal agenda to smear anyone that does not agree with them."In addition, a well reasoned human probably would not make a comment about my words speaking for themselves, because that falls under the "no sh*t" category of language comprehension.So my 30-39 year old conservative-in-denial please prove to me that you are not as moronic as you have made yourself out to be. Like this: If Buddy`s czar link is "disrespectful" to american voters, yet american voters disaprove of Bush. Then doesn`t that mean american voters are somehow anti-selves?
"shutit" Spoken like a true conservative, without a brain.
About Rush Limbaugh`s lies:I understand if you don`t read books, they are complicated with all those words and such, it must hurt your head everytime you look at something that is bigger than a paragraph. "Rush limbaugh is a big fat idiot" is actually researched, unlike anything you see on TV. But here is a link that contains many of Limbaughs lies on a single subject. Now discrediting something because it is a liberal link is a logical fallacy
I laughed so hard when I read that. You need to read "Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot", "The way things aren`t", or look at "media matters" website. But I already know what you are going to say: "These are just facts and they are getting in the way of me believing what ever I want."
Oh and bush did lie about the war. He made a multitude of claims that went against intelligence gathered at the time, so stop with the "bush told us nothing but the truth," your stupidity hurts my eyes.Unless you want to provide evidence supporting your claims, any of your claims, actually.
This dot-com should be a place people visit for their daily dose of anti-boredom. Instead, some links are promiscuously posted with a "yuk-yuk! Everybody hates Bush! This should get at least a 3.1!"I want to print these biased links, and blow my nose on them. Good links should be good links because they are amusing, controversial or funny, not because they appeal to an individual, or people who still watch MTV and allign themselves with whatever political beliefs are trendy. Yeah, these blatant liberal posts are overdone, and no longer funny. Ha ha. Not.
"I hate conservatives, but I really hate liberals." -Matt Stone, South Park co-creator
The media showing America only what they want to us to see doesn`t help either.
Imagine what Gore would have done if 9-11 had happened? Then what kind of boat would we be in?
Ah Phooey, too many ifs. I just hope we got the better man *prays*
If you can`t be smart about it, conservatives, least you can do is be original.
The truth is, whoever the other party, will also poke fun at the leader in power. You obviously never listened to Rush Limbaugh during the Clinton presidency if you think republicans don`t do the same thing when there is a democrat in the White House. And I mention Rush Limbaugh becuase he would do it with humor, which is very similar to this.
Perhaps you are too young to remember the Clinton administration? My guess is that`s true.