Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
Antother side note:I spent my honeymoon in the big ol` US of A two years ago, and the only way for me to get updated on what was going on in the rest of the world was to watch Comedy Central.
Debate all you want. You probably haven`t got a clue what you`re talking about anyway.
I mean, I could`ve quoted my favorite one of the last month, "If you can read this, you`re not the President!"
And on a personal note... Why are we -really- bothering to argue about this other then the sanctity of conversationalism? Obviously everyone has their own views on the war thats going on. Personally I think the whole thing is bull-poo and is, for the most part, a big waste. We should of kept it at "No wmds? Good." and left. Not "No wmds? *nuke*" With whats going on over there, if we pulled out right now from this war, we`d start another war. Hell, to be honest its probably about to start. WWIII. Some countries going to step in and smack us up and say "cut the poo out America." Im not taking any sides at all, its just my opinions that this whole war was a mistake.
Perhaps it should be tweaked to say the donations scandal is primarily a Republican problem, because they orchestrated it.
when bill won the argument, letterman decided to come up with an arbitrary insult, then cut to commercial
Someone said I was generalizing, but I`m not, and I`m sorry if that`s how it sounds. I know there are many Americans who oppose Bush and his stupid imperialistic actions.
I think it`s been more than proved by now that Iraq did not have WMD, and it isn`t such a hard thing to believe in that the US faked evidence and intelligence report to support the invasion (because the best intelligence agency in the world just can`t be >that< bad), even with the UN saying Iraq was being cooperative and that there was absolutley no need for an armed invasion. Nevertheless, the US didn`t give a sh*t about other countries` opinion and blew up the whole country anyway. Now, it`s up to you to clean up the mess - and I`m not saying the troops should get out of Iraq, on the contrary: they should stay and try to rebuild the nation for as long as needed.
Much as I`d hate to say it, Letterman clearly lost. I`ve no love for O`Reilly - or to put it another way, he`s a shmuck - but he knows how to argue. The trick to stump him, though, is 1. know what you`re talking about and 2. put him on the defensive and hold him accountable for what he says.
You are listening to the media again. There were actually more Democrats who benefited from the contributions. The media is trying to make this a republican scandal, imagine that.
Hey! Repubs have something in common with liberals!
P.S. Of COURSE Iraq allowed in UN inspectors...the name Hans Blix rings a bell maybe? It should, to Bush-apologist retards in particular perhaps. But don`t let the truth get in the way of your rambling...animals like O`Reilly and his "fans" have pretty much perfected this kind of rabid truthless spewing, so by all means don`t let facts slow you down any. As you were...
It is liberlism 101. What you said is what liberals do best. That is why they are not, and will not for a long time be in power.
Someday when you are older maybe you can understand.
Point taken. In that case, where are the radical religious nutbags?
Who says we aren`t going to attack Korea?
There are a million reasons why we invaded Iraq. It doesn`t "prove" anything.
And while Letterman admitted he doesn`t watch The Factor, he had this overall assessment: `I have the feeling about 60% of what you say is crap ? I don`t think you represent an objective viewpoint.O`REILLY: You have to give me an example if you`re going to make those statements.LETTERMAN: Well, I don`t watch your show, so that would be impossible. O`REILLY: Then why would you come to that conclusion if you don`t watch the program? LETTERMAN: Because of things that I`ve read, things that I know.
Newt Gingrich has also commented on David Letterman and O`Reilly. "I thought he (Letterman) was astonishingly lacking in information of any kind. This was like getting in a fight with a guy who has no idea what ring he is in."
You also seem to like overgeneralizing countries and coming up with an entirly wrong conclusion. I never thought that Americans were the best thing to happen to the world. Prove to me that we we`re there for oil. Go ahead.
No, most of us hate O`reily too.
How is that really putting him in his place?
How is O`Reilly supposed to argue with a moron?
And all you americans, stop acting like you`re the best thing that`s ever happened to the world. You`re not there for the WMD, you`re not there because of some `religious unrest`, you`re there to get oil and that`s it - by now I suppose you`ve all seen the mess you`ve made (the world sure has).
O`Reilly is so full of hot air. I recall watching his show and having him tell a guest of opposite opinion, (and I`m paraphrasing) "You need to see things my way." I would have had a direct quote, but I looked for the transcript of that particular episode on the Fox News website and couldn`t find it. Hmm.
I may not agree with O`Reilly in everything, but at least on his website he presented the ENTIRE interview to let people draw their own conclusions (out of character for him, a nice change).
I think they both were bickering like babies on a comedy show. Letterman looked just as retarded. "You`re crap...well...I don`t actually watch your show, but I`ve read you`re crap."
He doesn`t even watch the show to make an opinion? Hell, I at least watched it before I judged it! What a moron! Stop shoving biased crap in my face!
I agree, the troops should have been removed from Iraq a long time ago, they obviously dont want us occupying their country and are blowing us up etc till we leave, but no, the HillBilly President and the Lapdog Prime Minister wont listen to these drastic measures, so they just let thousands more die, because they want to play God!
Leave the politicing to the professionals. And to the Europeans...stop telling us to get the hell out of there...if you know your history, you will see once again how we are just fixing your f*cking mistakes.
Try looking up how Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia were first split, and why. Nothing more than a French-English scam for oil. Now, when we go to put to rest the religious unrest caused by dividing lines drawn up for the European wealth...we get looked at as greedy. Hell, many European countries didn`t even send soldiers in and expect a cut in the oil.
Know the facts before you open your mouth. Or you will look, and BE, a fool.
I have to agree with republicans on some things, and I have to agree with liberals on some things. Why does everybody need to go far left or far right all of a sudden? Why did name calling cheap shots take the place of discussing politics?
Even if you don`t agree with what O`Reilly said, you`d have to admit that Letterman is a complete dumbass.