Log in with a social network:
Log in with your username or email:
FOXNEWS O`REILLY 2,612,000FOXNEWS HANNITY/COLMES 1,645,000FOXNEWS BRIT HUME 1,615,000FOXNEWS GRETA 1,604,000FOXNEWS SHEP SMITH 1,552,000CNN LARRY KING 1,311,000CNN AARON BROWN 1,198,000CNN ZAHN 858,000CNN ANDERSON 786,000CNNHN GRACE 724,000MSNBC HARDBALL 494,000MSNBC OLBERMANN 469,000MSNBC RITA 399,000MSNBC SCARBOROUGH 344,000MSNBC TUCKER 296,000
As for the rest of the festivities, Fox News should frankly burn in hell. And anyone defending it (or the Bush admin, which is effectively the same thing) should have the hotter places reserved for them. There`s your "fair and balanced".
Ok then, I guess all of the civilians being killed are just foolishly wandering off into the designated war zone…
"some people belive anything they hear"
So… Is that part of the Fox News mission statement?
Biased "News" stations feed viewers what they want to believe, and report stories in different light accordingly. So its nice to trash the gross offenders. My favorite is "Pilate: We found him like that" Some pics are funny but too exaggerated to make a credible point.
Sorry Knightmare, while I do probably hold the same political views as you, burden of proof lies on the person making the claim.
So I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies.
Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about.
But trust me.... You don`t.
I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you dont know what you are talking about.
This is how bad info gets passed around.
If you dont know about the topic....Dont make yourself sound like you do.
Cuz some people belive anything they hear
And I don`t really think you know how to read or you would have understood my previous comment
And I`m starting to think you maybe jealous that I have friends... you seem unusally fixated on that fact. You know having friends, girlfriend, a life its not that unusual, maybe for a person who has 730 posts in a span of little over a month, but not for us "light dwellers"
Loofah loofah loofah...... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABill loves the loofah.
Well, considering that he was a slave who was seeking freedom from his oppressors, I’d surmise that he was just a bit more inclined towards liberal ideals than that the Romans were.
Yes, the difference is between wrongfully holding American citizens and bombing civilian areas in Iraq resulting in civilian casualties with no solid justification for war. Neither of these actions are acceptable. And BSR, Al Qaeda having a branch in Iraq doesn’t automatically mean that the government is working with them. In fact, we have yet to find any ties between Sadam’s government and the terrorist organization and the 9/11 commission says that Sadam turned down bin Laden’s request for cooperation because of Osama support for anti-Saddam Islamists in Iraqi Kurdistan. Think of it this way, we have militias and Neo-Nazi groups in the US, does that mean that our government is funding them?
It is a necessary evil. If we had the Patriot Act before 9/11, it would not have happened. Almost guarenteed.
Well, it just goes to show you that liberals can be just as rotten as conservatives. FDR’s abuse of power is no more outrageous than Bush using the patriot act as a way to violate the privacy or American citizens or commit to war over bad information and suddenly pretend that we initially went there to liberate Iraq rather than uncover non-existent WMD’s and links to terrorism. I’m sure that in both of these men’s minds, their actions were completely justified.
You never answered my question of your statement "They had the balls to fight, which would make them Conservative". Would you consider the reds of the Russians communist revolution to be conservative simply because they had the “balls” to fight? How about Spartacus and his army of slaves?
Fox News seriously sucks. I especially hate that Bill O`Reilly dude. What a retard.
Would that have made the Russian revolutionaries conservatives? Liberals fight when needed. It was Franklin D. Roosevelt, a Democrat, who saw America through WWII.
"As Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense, that always will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us. No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people, in their righteous might, will win through to absolute victory." ~ FDR
why are you on an american website?
BTW these are too funny. "We found him like that"
Ah, I don`t think there`s too much of a problem with the polarization when it comes to seriously discussing politics, save for when it automatically shuts a person`s mind off to another`s viewpoint. However, I still think it sad that when it comes to jokes that people get uppity about it, and this goes for jokes on both sides.
(and I do think there is a slight problem with polarization because it usually infers that everything is black or white, not a rainbow of colors.)
wasnt lincoln a republican?
dont liberals preech tolerence for diversity?
and if you dont like it dont watch it thats what that fabulous thing called a remote is for
I think BSR said it when he stated that liberals want more government intervention than conservatives. Looks like he`s got his facts straight.
"Mustard gas and Zyklon-B (not Zylon) are gasses, not weapons of mass destruction."
Pretty sure gases that kill in numbers such as these are considered weapons. And they do a pretty healthy amount of destruction to the humans that breathe it in, also. It doesn`t have to be a nuke to be a "weapon of mass destruction". Today`s WMD is considered to be nuclear. An early 1900`s-1940`s WMD would be considered whatever caused considerable damage. In this case, poisonous gases.
The way I look at it, Nazis are extreme right wing, and hippies are extreme left. I hate both of them, so I`m in the middle.
And I agree with erikahds main point. In any thread in any forum anywhere that has a political message, There will be some sort of polarization between sides, which really is unfortunate. The stereotypes in these jokes are just as true as any other stereotypes regarding race, social class, and what not. Only usually, people make less fuss if Dave Chapelle makes a joke centered on black stereotypes.
That is too funny.
On the plus side Bush always gives you some fodder to laugh at. Nothing perosnal, but seriously, how did someone so frighteningly poor at public speaking become your president? Last time I checked it was kind of a requirement for politicians. Look at Blair he`s got that whole smarmy slippery bastard politician thing down!
If you really ARE serious and if your political sentiments are THAT intense, please go to school or the military, learn, and find a job where you can put those feelings to good use. Or skip school and become a comedian or make your own humorous website. Either path is a path of leadership. But I-A-B isn`t good place to dwell on political feelings or throw a wet towel over other people`s laughs. Please lighten up and redirect yourselves, children, those of you who haven`t. You`re hurting yourselves and your *own* future children if you don`t. End of PSA.
I imagine conservatives are more willing to preserve existing liberties over creating additional liberties, especially towards women and homosexuals. Think on the civil rights movement of the 50s with M.L.K. Very much a liberal movement.
A perceived bias towards Christianity can easily be the enforcement of separation of church and state. That Christianity is the dominant religion in the States is coincidental.
Most conservatives I know are all for preserving civil liberties, they just want to see existing, constitutional laws enforced. They also think that laws should be created by the legislative branch, not the judicial.
Early in WWII, the British were very worried about Hitler using gas, and they distributed gas masks to people living in the cities.
I think it`s really pitiful that leftists feel like they have to attack Fox News, it at least provides a little balance to the CNN/ABC/CBS/NBC/NYT/WP that are pretty blatantly skewed to the left.
Mustard gas and Zyklon-B (not Zylon) are gasses, not weapons of mass destruction. They are chemical weapons and the only way for them to be of any use was to pump it into a small chamber. That Hitler had a large quantity does not qualify it as a WMD; a single, devastating bomb or somesuch is a WMD.
Actually, the Founding Fathers wanted more rights and civil liberties (or rather, the same rights that Englishmen enjoyed over in England, specifically towards taxation). Last I saw, it is the conservatives who are restricting liberties, leaving the ACLU (left-wing) to fight and get them back.
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
He was committing mass genocide with plans on advancing throughout the world. At the point he started out, no one had a WMD. In fact, the main reason we created the A-bomb was fear that the Germans would crate one first. He was trying to do it through military might.
"Who are these right wing nuts that want to overthrow our King George?"
Actually, the founding fathers, or "nuts" in this case, were revolutionaries who wanted freer government than what was available under British rule. That would have made them left wing compared to Great Britain’s ideas of how we should have been ruled.