iPod Shuffle

Submitted by: buddy 12 years ago Tech
http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/

It"s as small as a pack of gum, but no screen. I think I still prefer my mini ipod.
There are 31 comments:
Male 203
I have a blue one. I must say. it`s shexi.
only because it was free. :)
0
Reply
Male 1,361
they`re far better they record anything with a headphone jack^^^
0
Reply
Male 16
But there more expensive.
0
Reply
Male 578
I think I might get one of these http://us.creative.com/products/product....
0
Reply
Male 28
I dont think i would want my ipod that small. i would probably lose it...or eat it! haha
0
Reply
Male 169
Psh, I`ll stick with my regular iPod.
0
Reply
Male 16
My grandma said she would buy it for me, so I wont have to use my own money sweet. Im too cheap to buy Ipod mini. $100 good deal!
0
Reply
Female 346
yeah, i`m so proud of apple for catering to the lower end of the market but not sacrificing quality. same principle with the mac mini :)
0
Reply
Female 242
W0W.. i WANT 0NE.. HAHA.
0
Reply
Female 863
^Good point. Never thought of that. You would only be able to fit a bit over 100 songs in the 512MB, and about 250 on the 1GB.
0
Reply
Female 151
Why can`t we eat it? Mmm, ipod...

Anyway, this could be amusing, if it had more memory. With 512mb, the whole "what song is coming next" thing wouldn`t really work, because you`d have a good idea of what song are on there. With space like the regular ipods have, you would be able to have a few "oh yeah, that song" moments.

0
Reply
Female 863
^Thank you for the time and research Burnteffigy. Very amusing.
0
Reply
Female 368
the british site advises users not to "chew ipod shuffle."
0
Reply
Female 808
I still like my iPod.. I like it with a screen.
0
Reply
Female 368
lmao...the "do not eat ipod shuffle" warning would have been great on it`s own...but then i noticed that there is no such warning on the canadian site...even though both compare the ipod shuffle to a pack of gum...apparently they think canadians have enough sense to realize that it`s not actually a pack of gum...apparently they don`t think the same about americans...


0
Reply
Female 19
:-O -saves up money-
0
Reply
Female 2,035
They probably said not to eat it because they were comparing it to the size of packs of gum.
0
Reply
Female 2,035
I`d rather have a screen on my ipod... If i was lucky enough to have one.
0
Reply
Female 16
mehh..I like to have the option to know what songs I`m able to listen to.
0
Reply
Male 161
i aways put my songs on shuffles, would be a deal to me... but i live in Brazil, and it will show up 3 times what it already costs here... plus taxes...

Would be sweet if i knew someone to send one to me... put in a letter :p lol

0
Reply
Female 863
Eh, I guess that more people will have access to it since it is cheeper, but I`d rather have the screen. I`ll keep the ones I have.
0
Reply
Female 621
Hunh. If I were set on buying an iPod, I`d go for that, but since I`m not picky about that stuff (brand name things) I`d get a bigger, more durable MP3 player with a screen for only a few bucks more. :-)
0
Reply
Female 379
I was just going to comment on the not eating it part, but you beat me to it! It`s still funny enough to repeat.... do not eat iPod Shuffle! hahahahaha
0
Reply
Male 83
look at the bottom of the page it says not to eat it!...
0
Reply
Male 1,033
It`s not that good a deal, you can get mp3 players that size with screens for $20 more
0
Reply
Male 578
That`s not fair. :-(
0
Reply
Male 10,115
It`s definately a good deal. Of course, my iPod was free. :-)
0
Reply
Male 578
I thought it was a bad idea, until I saw that it only costs $100! I want one!
0
Reply
Male 1,033
THey invented them for the bottom end of the market, they`re really really cheap, because screens are expensive. So they marketed the fact you don`t know what song`s comming next as a good feature
0
Reply
Male 34
That looks pretty cool :D
0
Reply
Male 10,115
Link: iPod Shuffle [Rate Link] - It`s as small as a pack of gum, but no screen. I think I still prefer my mini ipod.

:-)

0
Reply